Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28556672›Full record

ArticleDiabetes technology & therapeutics2017

Faster Use and Fewer Failures with Needle-Free Nasal Glucagon Versus Injectable Glucagon in Severe Hypoglycemia Rescue: A Simulation Study.

Jean-François Yale, Hélène Dulude, Marc Egeth, Claude A Piché, Martin Lafontaine, Dolorès Carballo, Rebecca Margolies, Emily Dissinger, Adam R Shames, Nicole Kaplowitz and 3 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diabetes technology & therapeutics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.5field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 87 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Systematic Literature Review and Indirect Treatment Comparison of Three Ready-to-Use Glucagon Treatments for Severe Hypoglycemia.Diabetes therapy : research, treatment and education of diabetes and related disorders · 2023
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Nasal Glucagon.Hospital pharmacy · 2022
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jean-François Yale1 McGill Department of Medicine, McGill University Health Center, McGill University , Montréal, Québec, Canada .
Hélène Dulude2 Locemia Solutions , Montréal, Canada .
Marc Egeth3 Core Human Factors, Inc. , Bala Cynwyd, Pennsylvania, PA.
Claude A Piché2 Locemia Solutions , Montréal, Canada .
Martin Lafontaine2 Locemia Solutions , Montréal, Canada .
Dolorès Carballo2 Locemia Solutions , Montréal, Canada .
Rebecca Margolies3 Core Human Factors, Inc. , Bala Cynwyd, Pennsylvania, PA.
Emily Dissinger3 Core Human Factors, Inc. , Bala Cynwyd, Pennsylvania, PA.
Adam R Shames3 Core Human Factors, Inc. , Bala Cynwyd, Pennsylvania, PA.
Nicole Kaplowitz4 Formerly Core Human Factors, Inc. , Bala Cynwyd, Pennsylvania, PA.
Michelle Xiaotian Zhang5 Eli Lilly Canada, Inc. , Toronto, Ontario, Canada .
Shuyu Zhang6 Eli Lilly and Company , Indianapolis, IN.
Cristina B Guzman6 Eli Lilly and Company , Indianapolis, IN.
Eli Lilly (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDuring severe hypoglycemic episodes, people with diabetes depend on others to help with treatment. We compared needle-free nasal glucagon and commercially available injectable glucagon for ease of use by caregivers of people with diabetes and by others in treating simulated episodes of severe hypoglycemia.

methodsSixteen instructed caregivers and 15 noninstructed acquaintances administered nasal and injectable glucagon to manikins, simulating unconscious people with diabetes during severe hypoglycemia episodes.

resultsWith nasal glucagon, 15 caregivers (94%) and 14 acquaintances (93%) administered a full dose (mean time 0.27 and 0.44 min, respectively). One caregiver and one acquaintance did not administer nasal glucagon because they did not fully depress the plunger on the device. Two caregivers deliberately administered both insulin and nasal glucagon, believing that insulin would also help the patient. With injectable glucagon, eight caregivers (50%) injected glucagon (mean time 1.89 min), but only two (13%) administered the full dose. Three acquaintances (20%) injected a partial dose of injectable glucagon (mean time 2.40 min); none gave a full dose. Errors included injecting diluent only, bending the needle, and injecting with an empty syringe. Two caregivers and one acquaintance injected insulin because they confused insulin with injectable glucagon.

conclusionsMore than 90% of participants delivered full doses of nasal glucagon, while 13% and 0% of caregivers and acquaintances delivered full doses of injectable glucagon, indicating that nasal glucagon is easier for nonmedically trained people to administer. Thus, nasal glucagon has the potential to substantially improve treatment for patients experiencing a life-threatening episode of severe hypoglycemia.

Indexed as

Blood GlucoseAdministration, IntranasalCaregiversDiabetes Mellitus, Type 1GlucagonHumansHypoglycemiaInjectionsManikinsBlood GlucoseGlucagonHuman factorsHypoglycemiaInjectable glucagonNasal glucagon

Identifiers

PMID28556672
PMCPMC5563859
OpenAlexW2618448180

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.