Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28556620›Full record

SynthesisClinical and translational science2017

Systematic Review of Quantitative Measures of Stakeholder Engagement.

D J Bowen, T Hyams, M Goodman, K M West, J Harris-Wai, J-H Yu

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Clinical and translational science, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Patient and public engagement in research and health system decision making: A systematic review of evaluation tools.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2018
    Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Navigating ethical challenges of conducting randomized clinical trials on COVID-19.Philosophy, ethics, and humanities in medicine : PEHM · 2022
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

D J BowenUniversity of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
T HyamsUniversity of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
M GoodmanCollege of Global Public Health, New York University, New York, New York, USA.
K M WestUniversity of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
J Harris-WaiUniversity of California, San Francisco, California, USA.
J-H YuDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.

Funding

Genomic Health Care and the Medically UnderservedP50HG003374 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI BURKE, WYLIE G. · 2004 to 2014
$9.8M
Center for Transdisciplinary ELSI Research in Translational GenomicsP20HG007243 · NHGRI · KAISER FOUNDATION RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI HARRIS-WAI, JULIE NOEL, KOENIG, BARBARA A. · 2013 to 2016
$958k
Returning Exome and Whole Genome Sequencing Results R00HG007076 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI YU, JOON-HO · 2017 to 2019
$730k
Returning Exome and Whole Genome Results To Underserved Minority PopulationsK99HG007076 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI YU, JOON-HO · 2014 to 2015
$199k
NHGRI NIH HHS K99 HG007076NHGRI NIH HHS P20 HG007243NHGRI NIH HHS P50 HG003374NHGRI NIH HHS R00 HG007076
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

Review Literature as TopicStakeholder ParticipationHumansPublications

Identifiers

PMID28556620
PMCPMC5593160

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.