Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28555630›Full record

GuidelineThe American journal of gastroenterology2017

Colorectal Cancer Screening: Recommendations for Physicians and Patients from the U.S. Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer.

Douglas K Rex, C Richard Boland, Jason A Dominitz, Francis M Giardiello, David A Johnson, Tonya Kaltenbach, Theodore R Levin, David Lieberman, Douglas J Robertson

4 registry-linked trialsAbstract readPractice GuidelineReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Guideline in The American journal of gastroenterology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 4 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 341 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
341citing papers in PubMed, 8 pooled it
35.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03843957 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

Effectiveness and Implementation of mPATH-CRC: a Mobile Health System for Colorectal Cancer Screening

TypeinterventionalSponsorWake Forest University Health SciencesRan2019 to 2023Enrolled77,145ConditionsColorectal Cancer, Cancer, Rectum Cancer, Colon CancerArmsmPATH-CRC, mPATH-Checkin, "high touch" Implementation strategy, "low touch" Implementation Strategy
NCT05034185 completednot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Real-World Validation of an Artificial Intelligence Characterization Support (CADx) System for Prediction of Polyp Histology in Colonoscopy: A Prospective Multicentre Study

TypeobservationalSponsorChangi General HospitalRan2021 to 2022Enrolled450ConditionsColonic Polyp, Colonic Neoplasms, Colonic DysplasiaArmsComputer-aided diagnosis (CADx) support tool
NCT05423964 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Trainee Adenoma Detection Rate

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of Southern CaliforniaRan2023 to 2025Enrolled25ConditionsAdenoma, Adenoma Colon, Colorectal CancerArmsAI use in Endoscopy Room, Non-AI use Standard of Care endoscopy room
NCT07605897 phase4completednot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

A Single-Center, Randomized, Prospective, Single-Blinded Study to Assess the Safety, Quality, and Tolerance of a Bowel Preparation Using a Food Kit With Laxatives in a United States Veteran Population

TypeinterventionalSponsorJoseph SpataroRan2022 to 2025Enrolled57ConditionsBowel Preparation, Efficacy, Tolerability, Safety, Colon Cancer Screening, Bowel Preparation for ColonoscopyArmsUse of a standardized meal content (food-kit) the day prior to colonoscopy, Polyethylene glycol 3350 - electrolyte solution (GoLYTELY)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

341 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 793 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Delphi Initiative for Early-Onset Colorectal Cancer (DIRECt) International Management Guidelines.Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association · 2023
    Guideline
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Guideline
  9. A Randomized Trial of Choice Architecture and Mailed Colorectal Cancer Screening Outreach in a Community Health Setting.Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association · 2024
    Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review

281 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.

Douglas K RexIndiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.
C Richard BolandUniversity of California San Diego, San Diego, California, USA.
Jason A DominitzVA Puget Sound Health Care System, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Francis M GiardielloJohns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
David A JohnsonEastern Virginia Medical School, Norfolk, Virginia, USA.
Tonya KaltenbachSan Francisco Veterans Affairs Medical Center, San Francisco, California, USA.
Theodore R LevinKaiser Permanente Medical Center, Walnut Creek, California, USA.
David LiebermanOregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA.
Douglas J RobertsonVA Medical Center, White River Junction, Vermont, and Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, New Hampshire, USA.
Eastern Virginia Medical School · USIndiana University – Purdue University Indianapolis · USJohns Hopkins University · USKaiser Permanente Walnut Creek Medical Center · USOregon Health & Science University · USSan Francisco VA Medical Center · USUniversity of California, San Diego · USVA Puget Sound Health Care System · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This document updates the colorectal cancer (CRC) screening recommendations of the U.S. Multi-Society Task Force of Colorectal Cancer (MSTF), which represents the American College of Gastroenterology, the American Gastroenterological Association, and The American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. CRC screening tests are ranked in 3 tiers based on performance features, costs, and practical considerations. The first-tier tests are colonoscopy every 10 years and annual fecal immunochemical test (FIT). Colonoscopy and FIT are recommended as the cornerstones of screening regardless of how screening is offered. Thus, in a sequential approach based on colonoscopy offered first, FIT should be offered to patients who decline colonoscopy. Colonoscopy and FIT are recommended as tests of choice when multiple options are presented as alternatives. A risk-stratified approach is also appropriate, with FIT screening in populations with an estimated low prevalence of advanced neoplasia and colonoscopy screening in high prevalence populations. The second-tier tests include CT colonography every 5 years, the FIT-fecal DNA test every 3 years, and flexible sigmoidoscopy every 5 to 10 years. These tests are appropriate screening tests, but each has disadvantages relative to the tier 1 tests. Because of limited evidence and current obstacles to use, capsule colonoscopy every 5 years is a third-tier test. We suggest that the Septin9 serum assay (Epigenomics, Seattle, Wash) not be used for screening. Screening should begin at age 50 years in average-risk persons, except in African Americans in whom limited evidence supports screening at 45 years. CRC incidence is rising in persons under age 50, and thorough diagnostic evaluation of young persons with suspected colorectal bleeding is recommended. Discontinuation of screening should be considered when persons up to date with screening, who have prior negative screening (particularly colonoscopy), reach age 75 or have <10 years of life expectancy. Persons without prior screening should be considered for screening up to age 85, depending on age and comorbidities. Persons with a family history of CRC or a documented advanced adenoma in a first-degree relative age <60 years or 2 first-degree relatives with these findings at any age are recommended to undergo screening by colonoscopy every 5 years, beginning 10 years before the age at diagnosis of the youngest affected relative or age 40, whichever is earlier. Persons with a single first-degree relative diagnosed at ≥60 years with CRC or an advanced adenoma can be offered average-risk screening options beginning at age 40 years.

Indexed as

ColonoscopyMass ScreeningAdultAgedAged, 80 and overColorectal NeoplasmsEarly Detection of CancerFecesHumansMiddle AgedRisk AssessmentUnited States

Identifiers

PMID28555630
OpenAlexW2619143830

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.