Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28555443›Full record

ReviewMedizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin2017

[Extracorporeal lung support].

S Braune, A Sieweke, D Jarczak, S Kluge

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. [Current techniques for extracorporeal decarboxylation].Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin · 2019
    Review
  3. Low-flow COAnnals of intensive care · 2019
    Article
  4. [Organ assist devices in the future : Limits and perspectives].Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin · 2018
    Review
  5. [Life after ARDS].Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin · 2017
    Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

S BrauneKlinik für Intensivmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr. 52, 20246, Hamburg, Deutschland.
A SiewekeKlinik für Intensivmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr. 52, 20246, Hamburg, Deutschland.
D JarczakKlinik für Intensivmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr. 52, 20246, Hamburg, Deutschland.
S KlugeKlinik für Intensivmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr. 52, 20246, Hamburg, Deutschland. skluge@uke.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Systems for extracorporeal lung support have recently undergone significant technological improvements leading to more effective and safe treatment. Despite limited scientific evidence these systems are increasingly used in the intensive care unit for treatment of different types of acute respiratory failure. In general two types of systems can be differentiated: devices for extracorporeal carbon dioxide removal (ECCO

Indexed as

Extracorporeal Membrane OxygenationRespiratory Distress SyndromeRespiratory InsufficiencyHumansIntensive Care UnitsRespiration, ArtificialExtracorporeal membrane oxygenationHypercapniaRespiratory failureVentilationWeaning

Identifiers

PMID28555443

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.