Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28555442›Full record

ArticleMedizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin2018

[The treatment of acute secondary peritonitis : A retrospective analysis of the use of continuous negative pressure therapy].

V Müller, G Koplin, J Pratschke, W Raue

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

V MüllerChirurgische Klinik, Campus Charité Mitte, Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Deutschland. verena.mueller@charite.de.
G KoplinChirurgische Klinik, Campus Charité Mitte, Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Deutschland.
J PratschkeChirurgische Klinik, Campus Charité Mitte, Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Deutschland.
W RaueChirurgische Klinik, Campus Charité Mitte, Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Deutschland.
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatients with acute secondary peritonitis often need relaparotomies and open abdominal lavages. Continuous negative pressure therapy seems to be beneficial.

objectivesDoes the efficacy of the therapy depend on the continuous negative pressure system used? MATERIALS AND

methodsA retrospective analysis was performed in the Chirurgische Klinik der Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charité Campus Mitte, including all patients who underwent abdominal vacuum therapy between December 2013 and February 2015. Two different systems (ABThera®, KCI Medizinprodukte GmbH and Suprasorb® CNP Drainagefolie, Lohmann & Rauscher GmbH) were available for treatment.

resultsDuring the 14 month study period, 33 patients with acute secondary peritonitis were treated with abdominal negative pressure therapy. Vacuum therapy treatment was applied for a median of 4 days (range 0-22 days). Eight patients (24%) died during hospitalisation. After completion of intraabdominal vacuum therapy, direct fascial closure was feasible in 26 patients (79%). There were no differences concerning patient characteristics, duration of abdominal vacuum therapy, the possibility of direct fascial closure or morbidity and mortality with the two different systems used.

conclusionsAcute secondary peritonitis is associated with high morbidity. We achieved a lower mortality rate compared to prospective clinical trials using intraabdominal continuous negative pressure therapy. The effectiveness and cost efficiency of different therapy systems should be the topic of further research.

Indexed as

Negative-Pressure Wound TherapyPeritonitisAbdomenHumansProspective StudiesRetrospective StudiesIntraabdominal vacuum therapyOpen abdomenPeritonitisTemporary abdominal wall closure

Identifiers

PMID28555442
OpenAlexW2619632404

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.