Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28555421›Full record

SynthesisInternational journal of clinical pharmacy2017

Improving medication adherence among community-dwelling seniors with cognitive impairment: a systematic review of interventions.

Edeltraut Kröger, Ovidiu Tatar, Isabelle Vedel, Anik M C Giguère, Philippe Voyer, Laurence Guillaumie, Jean-Pierre Grégoire, Line Guénette

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International journal of clinical pharmacy, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Edeltraut KrögerCentre d'excellence sur le vieillissement de Québec, Axe Santé des populations et pratiques optimales en santé, Centre intégré universitaire des soins et services de santé de la Capitale nationale, Hôpital St-Sacrement, 1050 Chemin Ste-Foy, Room L2-30, Quebec City, QC, G1S 4L8, Canada. edeltraut.kroger.ciussscn@ssss.gouv.qc.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5653-3979
Ovidiu TatarDepartment of Family Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Isabelle VedelDepartment of Family Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Anik M C GiguèreCentre d'excellence sur le vieillissement de Québec, Axe Santé des populations et pratiques optimales en santé, Centre intégré universitaire des soins et services de santé de la Capitale nationale, Hôpital St-Sacrement, 1050 Chemin Ste-Foy, Room L2-30, Quebec City, QC, G1S 4L8, Canada.
Philippe VoyerCentre d'excellence sur le vieillissement de Québec, Axe Santé des populations et pratiques optimales en santé, Centre intégré universitaire des soins et services de santé de la Capitale nationale, Hôpital St-Sacrement, 1050 Chemin Ste-Foy, Room L2-30, Quebec City, QC, G1S 4L8, Canada.
Laurence GuillaumieFaculté des sciences infirmières, Université Laval, Quebec City, QC, Canada.
Jean-Pierre GrégoireFaculty of Pharmacy, Université Laval, Quebec City, QC, Canada.
Line GuénetteFaculty of Pharmacy, Université Laval, Quebec City, QC, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background Medication non-adherence may lead to poor therapeutic outcomes. Cognitive functions deteriorate with age, contributing to decreased adherence. Interventions have been tested to improve adherence in seniors with cognitive impairment or Alzheimer disease (AD), but high-quality systematic reviews are lacking. It remains unclear which interventions are promising. Objectives We conducted a systematic review to identify, describe, and evaluate interventions aimed at improving medication adherence among seniors with any type of cognitive impairment. Methods Following NICE guidance, databases and websites were searched using combinations of controlled and free vocabulary. All adherence-enhancing interventions and study designs were considered. Studies had to include community dwelling seniors, aged 65 years or older, with cognitive impairment, receiving at least one medication for a chronic condition, and an adherence measure. Study characteristics and methodological quality were assessed. Results We identified 13 interventions, including six RCTs. Two studies were of poor, nine of low/medium and two of high quality. Seven studies had sample sizes below 50 and six interventions focused on adherence to AD medication. Six interventions tested a behavioral, four a medication oriented, two an educational and one a multi-faceted approach. Studies rarely assessed therapeutic outcomes. All but one intervention showed improved adherence. Conclusion Three medium quality studies showed better adherence with patches than with pills for AD treatment. Promising interventions used educational or reminding strategies, including one high quality RCT. Nine studies were of low/moderate quality. High quality RCTs using a theoretical framework for intervention selection are needed to identify strategies for improved adherence in these seniors.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overAlzheimer DiseaseCognitive DysfunctionDrug Administration RoutesDrug Administration ScheduleDrug MonitoringHumansIndependent LivingMedication AdherenceRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicAdherenceAlzheimer diseaseCholinesterase inhibitorsCognitive impairmentCommunity-dwelling seniorsSystematic review

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.