Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28555402›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology2017

Clostridium difficile infections in Finland, 2008-2015: trends, diagnostics and ribotypes.

S Mentula, S M Kotila, O Lyytikäinen, S Ibrahem, J Ollgren, A Virolainen

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

S MentulaBacterial Infections Unit, Department of Health Security, National Institute for Health and Welfare (THL), P.O. Box 30, 00271, Helsinki, Finland. silja.mentula@thl.fi.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3712-1730
S M KotilaBacterial Infections Unit, Department of Health Security, National Institute for Health and Welfare (THL), P.O. Box 30, 00271, Helsinki, Finland.
O LyytikäinenInfectious Disease Control Unit, Department of Health Security, National Institute for Health and Welfare (THL), P.O. Box 30, 00271, Helsinki, Finland.
S IbrahemBacterial Infections Unit, Department of Health Security, National Institute for Health and Welfare (THL), P.O. Box 30, 00271, Helsinki, Finland.
J OllgrenInfectious Disease Control Unit, Department of Health Security, National Institute for Health and Welfare (THL), P.O. Box 30, 00271, Helsinki, Finland.
A VirolainenBacterial Infections Unit, Department of Health Security, National Institute for Health and Welfare (THL), P.O. Box 30, 00271, Helsinki, Finland.
Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare · FI

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We evaluated Clostridium difficile (CD) diagnostics in Finnish clinical microbiology laboratories during 2006-2011, with an update in 2015, in relation to CD surveillance data of the National Infectious Disease Register (NIDR) and ribotyping data from the national reference laboratory during the years 2008-2015. In 2011, diagnostic activity varied regionally more than three-fold and the positivity rate ranged between 7 and 21%. Nucleic acid amplification testing (NAAT) was implemented in the regions with high activity and NAAT users tested 30% more patients and found 15% more cases per population than those not using it. Culture was performed in 79% of laboratories, primary toxin testing by enzyme immunoassay (EIA) in 83% and by NAAT in 17%. In 2014, 12/19 laboratories used NAAT as the primary detection method and four as the secondary method, and ten cultured. Increasing usage of NAAT was not systematically related to various trends detected regionally in annual CD rates. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) ribotyping of 1771 CD isolates (4.1% of CD cases) identified 146 distinct profiles, of which 37% were binary toxin positive. The most common ribotype was 027, but its proportion decreased, while 078 slightly increased. Transition from culture to NAAT in CD infection (CDI) diagnostics did not cause a significant increase in the observed CDI incidence. Major differences between diagnostic activity, methods and strategies in different regions have persisted over the years, which should be considered when comparing the regional epidemiology of CDI.

Indexed as

RibotypingClostridioides difficileClostridium InfectionsDiagnostic Tests, RoutineFinlandHumansSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID28555402
OpenAlexW2618814050

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.