ReviewDer Urologe. Ausg. A2017
[Rare metabolic disorders and urolithiasis].
Review in Der Urologe. Ausg. A, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Numerous metabolic anomalies, which often have no direct pathological relevance when considered individually, are found in all people. In most patients with urinary tract stones, it can be assumed that a specific combination or interaction of these anomalies occurs, thus, resulting in stone formation, but only after individual exogenous risk factors are triggered. Lithogenesis is the result of a cascade of different "events" that are temporally close to one another, but sometimes these events interact strong enough that significant stone growth occurs. Chronic metabolic disorders usually lead to permanently altered urine compositions. The occurrence of physiological urine constituents in nonnormal concentration ratios and/or the nonphysiological excretion of metabolic products can significantly increase the lithogenicity of urine, so that urolithiasis can manifest itself as a clinical symptom. In cases of urolithiasis of unknown origin, a potentially hidden rare metabolic anomaly should always be considered. In addition, if a patient has a known metabolic disease, then this should always be taken into account as a risk factor for stone formation and attempts should be taken to clarify its influence on urine composition. This also applies to the efficacy of a therapy. A distinct link between a metabolic disease and stone formation is generally rare and will likely remain so despite significant advances regarding differential diagnosis and etiopathology. This article focuses on very rare metabolic causes and/or genetic syndromes which may be associated with urolithiasis. Patients receiving symptomatic stone treatment should receive life-long follow-up care from a urologist because reducing the recurrence rate helps to improve the quality of life of the patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.