ArticleThe Analyst2017
Micropatterned macroporous structures in microfluidic devices for viral separation from whole blood.
Article in The Analyst, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Porous Structural Microfluidic Device for Biomedical Diagnosis: A Review.Micromachines · 2023Review
- Characterizing Extracellular Vesicles and Their Diverse RNA Contents.Frontiers in genetics · 2020Review
- Tangential Flow Microfiltration for Viral Separation and Concentration.Micromachines · 2019Article
- Microfluidic and Paper-Based Devices for Disease Detection and Diagnostic Research.International journal of molecular sciences · 2018Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Separation and enrichment of bio-nanoparticles from cell suspensions and blood are critical steps in many chemical and biomedical practices. We demonstrate here the design and fabrication of a microfluidic immunochromatographic device incorporating regular and multiscale monolithic structures to capture viruses from blood. The device contains micropatterned arrays of macroporous materials to perform size-exclusion and affinity chromatography in a simple flow-through process. The microscale gaps in the array allow the passage of cells while the macroporous matrices promote viral capture. Computational analyses reveal that fluid permeation into the porous matrices is controllable by the micropattern shape, separation distance and dimensions. Experimental analyses using blood samples containing human immunodeficiency viruses (HIV) as a model system further prove significantly improved viral capture efficiency using devices incorporating multiscale structures than those containing solid micropatterns. Such microfluidic devices with regular and multiscale structures have a potential for the separation and concentration of a wide range of bio-nanoparticles as well as macromolecules from complex mixtures containing both nano- and micro-sized species.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.