Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28555185›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in cell and developmental biology2017

Molecular Determinants of Cephalopod Muscles and Their Implication in Muscle Regeneration.

Letizia Zullo, Sara M Fossati, Pamela Imperadore, Marie-Therese Nödl

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in cell and developmental biology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. The salamander blastema within the broader context of metazoan regeneration.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2023
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Motor control pathways in the nervous system of Octopus vulgaris arm.Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology · 2019
    Article
  14. Article
  15. mTOR as a Marker of Exercise and Fatigue inFrontiers in physiology · 2019
    Article
  16. Nerve regeneration in the cephalopod molluscJournal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2018
    Article
  17. Frontiers in physiology · 2018
    Article
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Letizia ZulloCentre for Synaptic Neuroscience and Technology, Fondazione Istituto Italiano di TecnologiaGenoa, Italy.
Sara M FossatiCentre for Synaptic Neuroscience and Technology, Fondazione Istituto Italiano di TecnologiaGenoa, Italy.
Pamela ImperadoreAssociation for Cephalopod Research (CephRes)Naples, Italy.
Marie-Therese NödlCentre for Synaptic Neuroscience and Technology, Fondazione Istituto Italiano di TecnologiaGenoa, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The ability to regenerate whole-body structures has been studied for many decades and is of particular interest for stem cell research due to its therapeutic potential. Several vertebrate and invertebrate species have been used as model systems to study pathways involved in regeneration in the past. Among invertebrates, cephalopods are considered as highly evolved organisms, which exhibit elaborate behavioral characteristics when compared to other mollusks including active predation, extraordinary manipulation, and learning abilities. These are enabled by a complex nervous system and a number of adaptations of their body plan, which were acquired over evolutionary time. Some of these novel features show similarities to structures present in vertebrates and seem to have evolved through a convergent evolutionary process.

Indexed as

cephalopoddevelopmentmuscleOctopus vulgarisregeneration

Identifiers

PMID28555185
PMCPMC5430041

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.