Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28555067›Full record

ArticleThe American journal of case reports2017

Outcome of a Modified Laparoscopic Suture Rectopexy for Rectal Prolapse with the Use of a Single or Double Suture: A Case Series of 15 Patients.

Daiki Yasukawa, Tomohide Hori, Takafumi Machimoto, Toshiyuki Hata, Yoshio Kadokawa, Tatsuo Ito, Shigeru Kato, Yuki Aisu, Yusuke Kimura, Yuichi Takamatsu and 2 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in The American journal of case reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 42% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Daiki YasukawaDepartment of Digestive Suregry, Tenri Hospital, Tenri, Nara, Japan.
Tomohide HoriDepartment of Digestive Suregry, Tenri Hospital, Tenri, Nara, Japan.
Takafumi MachimotoDepartment of Digestive Suregry, Tenri Hospital, Tenri, Nara, Japan.
Toshiyuki HataDepartment of Digestive Surgery, Tenri Hospital, Tenri, Nara, Japan.
Yoshio KadokawaDepartment of Digestive Surgery, Tenri Hospital, Tenri, Nara, Japan.
Tatsuo ItoDepartment of Digestive Suregry, Tenri Hospital, Tenri, Nara, Japan.
Shigeru KatoDepartment of Digestive Surgery, Tenri Hospital, Tenri, Nara, Japan.
Yuki AisuDepartment of Digestive Surgery, Tenri Hospital, Tenri, Nara, Japan.
Yusuke KimuraDepartment of Digestive Surgery, Tenri Hospital, Tenri, Nara, Japan.
Yuichi TakamatsuDepartment of Digestive Surgery, Tenri Hospital, Tenri, Nara, Japan.
Taku KitanoDepartment of Digestive Surgery, Tenri Hospital, Tenri, Nara, Japan.
Tsunehiro YoshimuraDepartment of Digestive Surgery, Tenri Hospital, Tenri, Nara, Japan.
Tenri Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND Surgery is considered to be a mainstay of therapy for full-thickness rectal prolapse (FTRP). Surgical procedures for FTRP have been described, but optimal treatment is still controversial. The aim of this report is to evaluate the safety and feasibility of a simplified laparoscopic suture rectopexy (LSR) in a case series of 15 patients who presented with FTRP and who had postoperative follow-up for six months. CASE REPORT Fifteen patients who underwent a modified LSR at our surgical unit from September 2010 were retrospectively evaluated. The mean age of the patients was 72.5±10.9 years. All 15 patients underwent general anesthesia, with rectal mobilization performed according to the plane of the total mesorectal excision. By lifting the mobilized and dissected rectum cranially to the promontorium, the optimal point for subsequent suture fixation of the rectum was marked. The seromuscular layer of the anterior right wall was then sutured to the presacral fascia using only one or two interrupted nonabsorbable polypropylene sutures. The mean operative time was 176.2±35.2 minutes, with minimal blood loss. No moderate or severe postoperative complications were observed, and there was no postoperative mortality. One patient (6.7%) developed recurrence of rectal prolapse one month following surgery. CONCLUSIONS The advantages of this LSR procedure for the management of patients with FTRP are its simplicity, safety, efficacy, and practicality and the potential for its use in patients who can tolerate general anesthesia.

Indexed as

Suture TechniquesAgedFemaleHumansLaparoscopyMaleOperative TimeRectal ProlapseRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID28555067
PMCPMC5459315
OpenAlexW2618838297

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.