Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28554911›Full record

Trial reportBMJ open2017

Navigating high-risk surgery: protocol for a multisite, stepped wedge, cluster-randomised trial of a question prompt list intervention to empower older adults to ask questions that inform treatment decisions.

Lauren J Taylor, Paul J Rathouz, Ana Berlin, Karen J Brasel, Anne C Mosenthal, Emily Finlayson, Zara Cooper, Nicole M Steffens, Nora Jacobson, Anne Buffington and 3 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMJ open, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02623335 (Navigating High Risk Surgery), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.9field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02623335 nacompletednot on this map

Navigating High Risk Surgery: Empowering Older Adults to Ask Questions That Inform Decisions About Surgical Treatment

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of Wisconsin, MadisonRan2016 to 2018Enrolled446ConditionsCommunicationArmsQPL (question prompt list) brochure
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Lauren J TaylorDepartment of Surgery, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
Paul J RathouzDepartment of Biostatistics and Medical Informatics, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
Ana BerlinDepartment of Surgery, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, New Jersey, USA.
Karen J BraselDepartment of Surgery, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA.
Anne C MosenthalDepartment of Surgery, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, New Jersey, USA.
Emily FinlaysonDepartment of Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA.
Zara CooperDepartment of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Nicole M SteffensDenver Public Health, Denver Health and Hospital Authority, Denver, Colorado, USA.
Nora JacobsonUniversity of Wisconsin Institute for Clinical and Translational Research, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
Anne BuffingtonDepartment of Surgery, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
Jennifer L TucholkaDepartment of Surgery, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
Qianqian ZhaoDepartment of Biostatistics and Medical Informatics, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
Margaret L SchwarzeDepartment of Surgery, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
University of Wisconsin–Madison · USRutgers, The State University of New Jersey · USBrigham and Women's Hospital · USDenver Health Medical Center · USOregon Health & Science University · USUniversity of California, San Francisco · USWisconsin Institutes for Discovery · US

Funding

Institutional Clinical and Translational Science AwardUL1TR000427 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI DREZNER, MARC KENNETH · 2012 to 2016
$32.2M
UW Surgical Oncology Research Training Program (UW-SORT)T32CA090217 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI Muhammed Murtaza, Heather B Neuman · 2001 to 2026
$8.3M
Institutional Clinical and Translational Science AwardKL2TR000428 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI DREZNER, MARC KENNETH · 2012 to 2016
$6.2M
NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR000428NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000427NCI NIH HHS T32 CA090217
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionOlder patients frequently undergo operations that carry high risk for postoperative complications and death. Poor preoperative communication between patients and surgeons can lead to uninformed decisions and result in unexpected outcomes, conflict between surgeons and patients, and treatment inconsistent with patient preferences. This article describes the protocol for a multisite, cluster-randomised trial that uses a stepped wedge design to test a patient-driven question prompt list (QPL) intervention aimed to improve preoperative decision making and inform postoperative expectations. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute-funded trial will be conducted at five academic medical centres in the USA. Study participants include surgeons who routinely perform vascular or oncological surgery, their patients and families. We aim to enrol 40 surgeons and 480 patients over 24 months. Patients age 65 or older who see a study-enrolled surgeon to discuss a vascular or oncological problem that could be treated with high-risk surgery will be enrolled at their clinic visit. Together with stakeholders, we developed a QPL intervention addressing preoperative communication needs of patients considering major surgery. Guided by the theories of self-determination and relational autonomy, this intervention is designed to increase patient activation. Patients will receive the QPL brochure and a letter from their surgeon encouraging its use. Using audio recordings of the outpatient surgical consultation, patient and family member questionnaires administered at three time points and retrospective chart review, we will compare the effectiveness of the QPL intervention to usual care with respect to the following primary outcomes: patient engagement in decision making, psychological well-being and post-treatment regret for patients and families, and interpersonal and intrapersonal conflict relating to treatment decisions and treatments received. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Approvals have been granted by the Institutional Review Board at the University of Wisconsin and at each participating site, and a Certificate of Confidentiality has been obtained. Results will be reported in peer-reviewed publications and presented at national meetings. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02623335.

Indexed as

CommunicationDecision MakingPatient ParticipationPhysician-Patient RelationsSurgical Procedures, OperativeSurveys and QuestionnairesAgedAged, 80 and overCross-Over StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPreoperative PeriodProspective StudiesReferral and Consultationcommunicationgeriatric surgeryquestion prompt listshared decision making

Identifiers

PMID28554911
PMCPMC5729991
OpenAlexW2620549800

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.