Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28554869›Full record

ArticleVeterinary microbiology2017

Pathogenicity of three genetically diverse strains of PRRSV Type 1 in specific pathogen free pigs.

Tomasz Stadejek, Lars E Larsen, Katarzyna Podgórska, Anette Bøtner, Sara Botti, Izabella Dolka, Michał Fabisiak, Peter M H Heegaard, Charlotte K Hjulsager, Tomasz Huć and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Veterinary microbiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. The scene of lung pathology during PRRSV-1 infection.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2024
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Tomasz StadejekWarsaw University of Life Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Department of Pathology and Veterinary Diagnostics, Nowoursynowska 159C, 02-776 Warsaw, Poland. Electronic address: tomasz_stadejek@sggw.pl.
Lars E LarsenNational Veterinary Institute, Technical University of Denmark, Bülowsvej 27, 1870 Frederiksberg C, Denmark.
Katarzyna PodgórskaNational Veterinary Research Institute, Swine Diseases Department, Partyzantów 57, 24-100 Puławy, Poland.
Anette BøtnerNational Veterinary Institute, Technical University of Denmark, Lindholm, Kalvehave 4771, Denmark.
Sara BottiParco Tecnologico Padano, Polo Universitario, Via Einstein 26900 Lodi, Italy.
Izabella DolkaWarsaw University of Life Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Department of Pathology and Veterinary Diagnostics, Nowoursynowska 159C, 02-776 Warsaw, Poland.
Michał FabisiakWarsaw University of Life Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Department of Pathology and Veterinary Diagnostics, Nowoursynowska 159C, 02-776 Warsaw, Poland.
Peter M H HeegaardNational Veterinary Institute, Technical University of Denmark, Bülowsvej 27, 1870 Frederiksberg C, Denmark.
Charlotte K HjulsagerNational Veterinary Institute, Technical University of Denmark, Bülowsvej 27, 1870 Frederiksberg C, Denmark.
Tomasz HućWarsaw University of Life Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Department of Pathology and Veterinary Diagnostics, Nowoursynowska 159C, 02-776 Warsaw, Poland.
Lise K KvisgaardNational Veterinary Institute, Technical University of Denmark, Bülowsvej 27, 1870 Frederiksberg C, Denmark.
Rafał SapierzyńskiWarsaw University of Life Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Department of Pathology and Veterinary Diagnostics, Nowoursynowska 159C, 02-776 Warsaw, Poland.
Jens NielsenNational Veterinary Research Institute, Swine Diseases Department, Partyzantów 57, 24-100 Puławy, Poland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Studies from Eastern European countries proved that porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus Type 1 (PRRSV-1) harbours high genetic diversity and that genetically divergent subtypes 2-4 circulate in this area. In the present study, we compared the pathogenicity of two different PRRSV-1 subtype 2 strains and a strain representing PRRSV-1 subtype 1. Four groups of 8-week-old specific pathogen free pigs were either infected with subtype 2 strain ILI6, subtype 2 strain or BOR59, subtype 1 strain 18794, or mock inoculated. The most pronounced clinical signs were observed in pigs infected with BOR59. Pigs from both subtype 2 strain infected groups exhibited significantly elevated mean body temperatures on DPI 2 compared to the other two groups, the difference remaining significant up to DPI 13 for the BOR59 group, only. The pigs in the latter group also displayed significantly highest levels of early viremia together with the most rapid APP response. Overall, the results indicated that BOR59 strain can be considered a highly pathogenic strain, similarly to subtype 3 strains Lena and SU1-bel, while the virulence of the other subtype 2 strain ILI6 was intermediate between BOR59 and subtype 1 strain.

Indexed as

Genetic VariationAnimalsPorcine Reproductive and Respiratory SyndromePorcine respiratory and reproductive syndrome virusRandom AllocationSpecific Pathogen-Free OrganismsSwineVirulence

Identifiers

PMID28554869
PMCPMC7127113

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.