Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28554851›Full record

ReviewAppetite2018

Executive function in childhood obesity: Promising intervention strategies to optimize treatment outcomes.

Jacqueline F Hayes, Dawn M Eichen, Deanna M Barch, Denise E Wilfley

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Appetite, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
11.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 85 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Children's eating behaviours and related constructs: conceptual and theoretical foundations and their implications.The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity · 2023
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jacqueline F HayesWashington University in St. Louis, 1 Brookings Drive, St. Louis, MO 63130, United States. Electronic address: Jacqueline.hayes@wustl.edu.
Dawn M EichenUniversity of California, San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive #0874, La Jolla, CA 92093, United States.
Deanna M BarchWashington University in St. Louis, 1 Brookings Drive, St. Louis, MO 63130, United States.
Denise E WilfleyWashington University in St. Louis, 1 Brookings Drive, St. Louis, MO 63130, United States.
Washington University in St. Louis · USUniversity of California San Diego · US

Funding

NUTRITION-BEHAVIORAL CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE PREVENTIONT32HL007456 · NHLBI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI WILFLEY, DENISE ELLA · 1985 to 2014
$2.9M
NHLBI NIH HHS T32 HL007456
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Executive functions (EFs) are hypothesized to play a role in the development and maintenance of obesity due to their role in self-regulatory processes that manage energy-balance behaviors. Children with obesity have well-documented deficits in EF, which may impede effectiveness of current, evidence-based treatments. This review examines top-down EF processes (e.g., inhibitory control, working memory, cognitive flexibility), as well as bottom-up automatic processes that interact with EFs (e.g., attentional bias, delay discounting) and their relation to weight-loss treatment success in children. It then evaluates EF-related interventions that may improve treatment response. Empirical studies that included an intervention purported to affect EF processes as well as pre-post measurements of EF and/or relative weight in populations ages 19 or younger with overweight/obesity were reviewed. Findings indicate that poorer EF may hinder treatment response. Moreover, there is preliminary evidence that behavioral weight loss intervention and physical activity may positively affect EF and that improvements in EF are related to enhanced weight loss. Finally, novel intervention strategies, such as computer training of core EFs, attention modification programs, and episodic future thinking, show promise in influencing both EFs and EF-related skills and weight. Further research is needed to provide more conclusive evidence of the efficacy of these interventions and additional applications and settings should be considered.

Indexed as

Executive FunctionAdolescentAttentional BiasChildCognitionDelay DiscountingExerciseHealth BehaviorHumansInhibition, PsychologicalMemory, Short-TermPediatric ObesityRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTreatment OutcomeWeight Loss

Identifiers

PMID28554851
PMCPMC5702584
OpenAlexW2618585433

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.