Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28554310›Full record

ReviewCurrent pharmaceutical design2017

Ion Channel and Neurotransmitter Modulators as Electroceutical Approaches to the Control of Cancer.

Jack Tuszynski, Tatiana M Tilli, Michael Levin

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current pharmaceutical design, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 51 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Bioelectricity in dental medicine: a narrative review.Biomedical engineering online · 2024
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Ion Channels in Cancer: Orchestrators of Electrical Signaling and Cellular Crosstalk.Reviews of physiology, biochemistry and pharmacology · 2022
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Therapeutically leveraging GABAExperimental biology and medicine (Maywood, N.J.) · 2021
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Frontiers in veterinary science · 2021
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Jack TuszynskiDepartment of Oncology, Faculty of Medicine & Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta. Canada.
Tatiana M TilliLaboratory of Biological System Modeling, National Institute for Science and Technology on Innovation in Neglected Diseases (INCT/IDN), Center for Technological Development in Health (CDTS), Oswaldo Cruz Foundation (Fiocruz), Rio de Janeiro. Brazil.
Michael LevinBiology Department, and Allen Discovery Center, Tufts University, Medford, MA, 02155. United States.
Fundação Oswaldo Cruz · BRTufts University · USUniversity of Alberta · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The activities of individual cells must be tightly coordinated in order to build and maintain complex 3- dimensional body structures during embryogenesis and regeneration. Thus, one way to view cancer is within systems biology as a network disorder affecting the ability of cells to properly interact with a morphodynamic field of instructive signals that keeps proliferation and migration orchestrated toward the anatomical needs of the host organism. One layer of this set of instructive microenvironmental cues is bioelectrical. Voltage gradients among all somatic cells (not just excitable nerve and muscle) control cell behavior, and the ionic coupling of cells into networks via electrochemical synapses allows them to implement tissue-level patterning decisions. These gradients have been increasingly implicated in the induction and suppression of tumorigenesis and metastasis, in the emerging links between developmental bioelectricity to the cancer problem. Consistent with the well-known role of neurotransmitter molecules in transducing electrical activity to downstream cascades in the brain, serotonergic signaling has likewise been implicated in cancer. Here, we review these recent data and propose new approaches for manipulating bioelectric and neurotransmitter pathways in cancer biology based on a bioelectric view of cancer. To support this methodology, we present new data on the effects of the SSRI Prozac and its analog (ZINC ID = ZINC06811610) on survival of both cancer (MCF7) and normal (MCF10A) breast cells exposed to these compounds. We found an IC50 concentration (25 µM for Prozac and 100 µM for the Prozac analog) at which these compounds inhibited tumor cell survival and proliferation. Additionally, at these concentrations, we did not observe alterations in a non-tumoral cell line. This constitutes a proof-of-concept demonstration for our hypothesis that the use of both existing and novel drugs as electroceuticals could serve as an alternative to highly toxic chemotherapy strategies replacing or augmenting them with less toxic alternatives. We believe this new approach forms an exciting roadmap for future biomedical advances.

Indexed as

Bioelectric Energy SourcesAnimalsAntineoplastic AgentsCell ProliferationCell SurvivalFluoxetineHumansIon ChannelsNeoplasmsNeurotransmitter AgentsSelective Serotonin Reuptake InhibitorsAntineoplastic AgentsFluoxetineIon ChannelsNeurotransmitter AgentsSelective Serotonin Reuptake InhibitorsbioelectricitybiophysicsIon channelsneurotransmitterProzacresting potentialserotoninSSRI

Identifiers

PMID28554310
PMCPMC6340161
OpenAlexW2617459439

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.