Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28554220›Full record

ArticleThe European journal of general practice2017

Experiences of hospital-based multidisciplinary team meetings in oncology: An interview study among participating general practitioners.

Peter Pype, Fien Mertens, Jeanluc Belche, Christiane Duchesnes, Laurence Kohn, Marij Sercu, Myriam Deveugele

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The European journal of general practice, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Cross-sectoral video consultations in cancer care: perspectives of cancer patients, oncologists and general practitioners.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2021
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Peter Pypea Department of Family Medicine and Primary Healthcare , Ghent University , Ghent , Belgium.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2273-0250
Fien Mertensa Department of Family Medicine and Primary Healthcare , Ghent University , Ghent , Belgium.
Jeanluc Belcheb Département Universitaire de Médecine Générale, Faculté de Médecine , Université de Liège , Liege , Belgium.
Christiane Duchesnesb Département Universitaire de Médecine Générale, Faculté de Médecine , Université de Liège , Liege , Belgium.
Laurence Kohnc Belgian Health Care Knowledge Centre (KCE) , Brussels , Belgium.
Marij Sercua Department of Family Medicine and Primary Healthcare , Ghent University , Ghent , Belgium.
Myriam Deveugelea Department of Family Medicine and Primary Healthcare , Ghent University , Ghent , Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCancer care has become complex, requiring healthcare professionals to collaborate to provide high-quality care. Multidisciplinary oncological team (MDT) meetings in the hospital have been implemented to coordinate individual cancer patients' care. General practitioners (GPs) are invited to join, but their participation is minimal.

objectivesAim of this study is to explore participating GPs' perceptions of their current role and to understand their preferences towards effective role execution during MDT meetings.

methodsIn May to June 2014, semi-structured interviews (n = 16) were conducted involving GPs with MDT experience in Belgium. The analysis was done according to qualitative content analysis principles.

resultsAttendance of an MDT meeting is perceived as part of the GP's work, especially for complex patient care situations. Interprofessional collaborative relationships and the GP's perceived benefit to the MDT meeting discussions are important motivators to participate. Enhanced continuity of information flow and optimized organizational time management were practical aspects triggering the GP's intention to participate. GPs valued the communication with the patient before and after the meeting as an integral part of the MDT dynamics.

conclusionGPs perceive attendance of the MDT meeting as an integral part of their job. Suggestions are made to enhance the efficiency of the meetings.

Indexed as

General PracticePatient Care TeamPhysician's RoleAdultAgedAttitude of Health PersonnelCommunicationFemaleGroup ProcessesHumansInterprofessional RelationsMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasmsQualitative ResearchTime Managementgeneral practitionersInterdisciplinary communicationmedical oncologypatient care team

Identifiers

PMID28554220
PMCPMC5774280

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.