Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28553836›Full record

Trial reportNeuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology2017

A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Sequential Parallel Comparison Design Trial of Adjunctive Riluzole for Treatment-Resistant Major Depressive Disorder.

Sanjay J Mathew, Ralitza Gueorguieva, Cynthia Brandt, Maurizio Fava, Gerard Sanacora

Open access · bronzeAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Sanjay J MathewMental Health Care Line, Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Ralitza GueorguievaDepartment of Psychiatry, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.
Cynthia BrandtDepartments of Emergency Medicine and Anesthesiology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.
Maurizio FavaDepartment of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Gerard SanacoraDepartment of Psychiatry, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.
Yale University · USBaylor College of Medicine · USMassachusetts General Hospital · US

Funding

Yale Clinical and Translational Science Award (U Component)UL1TR001863 · NCATS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI John H. Krystal, LUCILA OHNO-MACHADO · 2016 to 2026
$102.9M
1/3-Efficacy and Tolerability of Riluzole in Treatment-Resistant DepressionR01MH085055 · NIMH · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI SANACORA, GERARD · 2010 to 2013
$1.5M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001863NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH085055
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Riluzole is a glutamate-modulating agent with neuroprotective properties approved for use in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. The efficacy and safety of riluzole vs placebo as an adjunct to antidepressant medication in outpatients with major depressive disorder (MDD) was examined in a 3-site, 8-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, fixed-dose trial using a sequential parallel comparison design comprised of two phases of 4 weeks. Patients with MDD in a current major depressive episode (N=104) with an inadequate response to either a prospective or a historical trial of an antidepressant medication were randomized in a 2 : 3 : 3 ratio to the treatment sequences of riluzole/riluzole, placebo/placebo, and placebo/riluzole, respectively. The primary outcome was change in depression severity, as assessed by the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS). Secondary efficacy outcomes included the response rate, defined as at least a 50% improvement in MADRS, Clinical Global Impressions severity and improvement subscales, and patient-reported measures of depression and cognitive function. Eighty-five patients completed the randomized treatment phases. Treatment groups did not differ in mean change in MADRS scores, response rate, or in any secondary efficacy outcomes. Riluzole was generally well tolerated, with a side effect profile consistent with its clinical use. In conclusion, a fixed dose of riluzole (100 mg/day) did not show adjunctive antidepressant efficacy compared to placebo. The trial was adequately powered to detect a moderate riluzole effect, and the risk for exaggerated placebo responses was mitigated. The lack of efficacy suggests that mechanisms underlying riluzole's neuroprotective effects are insufficient for clinical response in treatment-resistant depression.

Indexed as

AdultAmbulatory CareAntidepressive AgentsDepressive Disorder, Treatment-ResistantDouble-Blind MethodDrug Therapy, CombinationFemaleHumansMajor Depressive DisorderMaleMiddle AgedNeuroprotective AgentsPsychiatric Status Rating ScalesRiluzoleSeverity of Illness IndexTreatment OutcomeAntidepressive AgentsNeuroprotective AgentsRiluzole

Identifiers

PMID28553836
PMCPMC5686483
OpenAlexW2619540067

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.