Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28553144›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of women's health2017

Transdermal delivery of combined hormonal contraception: a review of the current literature.

Rosanna M Galzote, Sally Rafie, Rachel Teal, Sheila K Mody

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of women's health, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
5.0field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 64 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Contraceptive Care in the Rheumatic Diseases: A Review.Journal of clinical rheumatology : practical reports on rheumatic & musculoskeletal diseases · 2024
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Recent progress of polymeric microneedle-assisted long-acting transdermal drug delivery.Journal of pharmacy & pharmaceutical sciences : a publication of the Canadian Society for Pharmaceutical Sciences, Societe canadienne des sciences pharmaceutiques · 2024
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Biomaterials and Contraception: Promises and Pitfalls.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2020
    Review
  14. CE: An Evidence-Based Update on Contraception.The American journal of nursing · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Rosanna M GalzoteSection of Family Planning, Department of Reproductive Medicine, University of California, San Diego.
Sally RafieDepartment of Pharmacy, UC San Diego Health, San Diego, CA, USA.
Rachel TealSection of Family Planning, Department of Reproductive Medicine, University of California, San Diego.
Sheila K ModySection of Family Planning, Department of Reproductive Medicine, University of California, San Diego.
University of California San Diego · USUC San Diego Health System · US

Funding

UC San Diego Womens Reproductive Health Research ProgramK12HD001259 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI CYNTHIA GYAMFI-BANNERMAN · 1999 to 2026
$9.1M
NICHD NIH HHS K12 HD001259
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The transdermal patch provides an effective and convenient option for hormonal contraception. The patch currently on the US market contains 150 µg norelgestromin and 35 µg ethinylestradiol (EE). The 20 cm

Indexed as

contraceptive patchgestodene patchhormonal patchlevonorgestrel patchOrtho-Evratransdermal

Identifiers

PMID28553144
PMCPMC5440026
OpenAlexW2615272948

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.