Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28553140›Full record

ReviewBreast cancer (Dove Medical Press)2017

Current perspectives on CHEK2 mutations in breast cancer.

Panagiotis Apostolou, Ioannis Papasotiriou

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Breast cancer (Dove Medical Press), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 71 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
71citing papers in PubMed
9.2field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

71 citing papers in PubMed, 130 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Short Report: The Variants inJournal of clinical medicine · 2025
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Public neoantigens in breast cancer immunotherapy (Review).International journal of molecular medicine · 2024
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

11 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Panagiotis ApostolouDepartment of Molecular Medicine, Research Genetic Cancer Centre S.A. (R.G.C.C. S.A.), Florina, Greece.
Ioannis PapasotiriouDepartment of Molecular Medicine, Research Genetic Cancer Centre S.A. (R.G.C.C. S.A.), Florina, Greece.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Checkpoint kinase 2 (CHEK2) is a serine/threonine kinase which is activated upon DNA damage and is implicated in pathways that govern DNA repair, cell cycle arrest or apoptosis in response to the initial damage. Loss of kinase function has been correlated with different types of cancer, mainly breast cancer. CHEK2 functionality is affected by different missense or deleterious mutations. CHEK2*1100delC and I157T are most studied in populations all over the world. Although these variants have been identified in patients with breast cancer, their frequency raises doubts about their importance as risk factors. The present article reviews the recent advances in research on CHEK2 mutations, focusing on breast cancer, based on the latest experimental data.

Indexed as

breast cancerCHEK2

Identifiers

PMID28553140
PMCPMC5439543
OpenAlexW2612846717

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.