Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28553085›Full record

ArticlePatient preference and adherence2017

Psychometric properties of the Ruminative Response Scale-short form in a clinical sample of patients with major depressive disorder.

Nathalie Parola, Xavier Yves Zendjidjian, Marine Alessandrini, Karine Baumstarck, Anderson Loundou, Guillaume Fond, Fabrice Berna, Christophe Lançon, Pascal Auquier, Laurent Boyer

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Patient preference and adherence, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04613713 (Effectiveness and Cost-utility of Somatocognitive Therapy Versus Treatment as Usual for Provoked), which is not on this map. Cited by 30 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04613713 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Effectiveness and Cost-utility of Somatocognitive Therapy Versus Treatment as Usual for Provoked (Localized) Vestibulodynia - a Randomized Clinical Trial (ProLoVe Study)

TypeinterventionalSponsorOslo Metropolitan UniversityRan2021 to 2025Enrolled128ConditionsVulvodynia, VestibulodyniaArmsSomatocognitive physiotherapy, Treatment as usual
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Nathalie ParolaPublic Health, Chronic Diseases and Quality of Life - Research Unit EA 3279, Aix-Marseille University, Marseille.
Xavier Yves ZendjidjianPublic Health, Chronic Diseases and Quality of Life - Research Unit EA 3279, Aix-Marseille University, Marseille.
Marine AlessandriniPublic Health, Chronic Diseases and Quality of Life - Research Unit EA 3279, Aix-Marseille University, Marseille.
Karine BaumstarckPublic Health, Chronic Diseases and Quality of Life - Research Unit EA 3279, Aix-Marseille University, Marseille.
Anderson LoundouPublic Health, Chronic Diseases and Quality of Life - Research Unit EA 3279, Aix-Marseille University, Marseille.
Guillaume FondFondation FondaMental, Créteil.
Fabrice BernaFondation FondaMental, Créteil.
Christophe LançonPublic Health, Chronic Diseases and Quality of Life - Research Unit EA 3279, Aix-Marseille University, Marseille.
Pascal AuquierPublic Health, Chronic Diseases and Quality of Life - Research Unit EA 3279, Aix-Marseille University, Marseille.
Laurent BoyerPublic Health, Chronic Diseases and Quality of Life - Research Unit EA 3279, Aix-Marseille University, Marseille.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Ruminative Response Scale (RRS)-short form is one of the most widely used measures of rumination, comprising ten items and two components: reflection and brooding. The aim of this study was to investigate RRS validity and reliability in a clinical sample of French patients with major depressive disorder (MDD). SUBJECTS AND

methodsOutpatients with a DSM-IV-TR diagnosis of MDD were recruited from a public academic hospital in France. Depressive symptoms were evaluated by the Beck Depression Inventory, anxiety by the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory - state scale, and quality of life by the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) questionnaire. Confirmatory factor analyses, item-dimension correlations, Cronbach's

resultsA total of 109 patients participated. The final reflection-brooding two-factor model of the RRS showed a good fit (root-mean-square error of approximation 0.041, comparative fit index 0.987, standardized root-mean-square residual 0.048) after removing one item (daily diary writing). Internal item consistency and reliability were satisfactory for the two dimensions. External validity testing confirmed that RRS scores were correlated with Beck Depression Inventory, State-Trait Anxiety Inventory, and SF-36 scores. There was no differential item functioning across sexes.

conclusionThese results demonstrated good scale reliability and validity for assessing rumination in patients with MDD.

Indexed as

major depressive disorderpsychometric propertiesreliabilityresponse-style theoryruminationvalidity

Identifiers

PMID28553085
PMCPMC5440078

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.