Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28553082›Full record

ReviewDrug design, development and therapy2017

Ten years of biosimilars in Europe: development and evolution of the regulatory pathways.

Martin Schiestl, Markus Zabransky, Fritz Sörgel

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Drug design, development and therapy, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Horizon scan of the clinical development landscape of biosimilar products in the UK and EU.International journal of technology assessment in health care · 2026
    Article
  6. Drug Delivery Technologies for the Treatment of Age-Related Macular Degeneration.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Association Between Filgrastim Biosimilar Availability and Changes in Claim Payments and Patient Out-of-Pocket Costs for Biologic Filgrastim Products.Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research · 2020
    Article
  12. ATR-FTIR spectroscopy and spectroscopic imaging for the analysis of biopharmaceuticals.Spectrochimica acta. Part A, Molecular and biomolecular spectroscopy · 2020
    Review
  13. Article
  14. The Path Towards a Tailored Clinical Biosimilar Development.BioDrugs : clinical immunotherapeutics, biopharmaceuticals and gene therapy · 2020
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Martin SchiestlSandoz GmbH, Kundl, Austria.
Markus ZabranskySandoz Biopharmaceuticals, Hexal AG, Holzkirchen, Germany.
Fritz SörgelInstitute for Biomedical and Pharmaceutical Research, Nürnberg-Heroldsberg, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A biosimilar is defined by the European Medicines Agency as a biological medicine that is similar to another biological medicine that has already been authorized for use. A science-based regulatory framework to ensure high-quality biosimilars has been established in Europe since 2005 and is monitored and updated on an ongoing basis. The guiding principle of a biosimilar development program is to establish similarity between the biosimilar and the reference medicine by the best possible means, ensuring that the previously proven safety and efficacy of the reference medicinal product also applies to the biosimilar. Development of a biosimilar is underpinned by state-of-the-art analytical techniques to characterize both reference medicines and biosimilars. The extent and nature of the nonclinical in vivo studies and clinical studies to be performed depend on the level of evidence obtained in the previous step(s), including the robustness of the physicochemical, biological, and nonclinical in vitro data. Extrapolation is an important element of the biosimilarity concept. When biosimilar comparability has been demonstrated in one indication, extrapolation of the data package to other indications of the reference medicine could be acceptable, but needs to be scientifically justified and considered in light of the demonstrated level of sameness by all analytical, nonclinical, and clinical data. The credibility of the scientific basis behind the biosimilar concept, and quality of regulatory decision-making, is demonstrated by the successful approval and clinical use of 20 biosimilar medicines since 2006 when Omnitrope

Indexed as

Drug ApprovalBiosimilar PharmaceuticalsDecision MakingDrug and Narcotic ControlDrug DesignDrug PackagingEuropeHuman Growth HormoneHumansBiosimilar PharmaceuticalsHuman Growth HormonebiosimilarsOmnitrope®regulatory pathways

Identifiers

PMID28553082
PMCPMC5440034

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.