ArticlePloS one2017
Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic integration and modelling of florfenicol for the pig pneumonia pathogens Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae and Pasteurella multocida.
Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
22 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.
- Dose Optimization of Tilmicosin againstJournal of agricultural and food chemistry · 2026Article
- Phenotype-Specific Semi-Mechanistic Modelling of Florfenicol Time-Kill Curves in G. Parasuis Compared to Other Respiratory Pathogens.Journal of veterinary pharmacology and therapeutics · 2025Article
- Serovar and multilocus sequence typing analysis of Pasteurella multocida from diseased pigs in Taiwan.BMC veterinary research · 2025Article
- Florfenicol administration in piglets co-selects for multiple antimicrobial resistance genes.mSystems · 2024Article
- Susceptibility ofAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Florfenicol in Plasma and Synovial Fluid of Pigs at a Dose of 30 mg/kgAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic integration of tilmicosin againstFrontiers in veterinary science · 2023Article
- Temporal Patterns of Phenotypic Antimicrobial Resistance and Coinfecting Pathogens inPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Synovial and Systemic Pharmacokinetics of Florfenicol and PK/PD Integration againstPharmaceutics · 2022Article
- PK/PD integration of florfenicol alone and in combination with doxycycline againstFrontiers in veterinary science · 2022Article
- Pharmacodynamic Parameters of Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) Integration Models.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2022Review
- Optimal regimens based on PK/PD cutoff evaluation of ceftiofur against Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae in swine.BMC veterinary research · 2020Article
- Article
- Pharmacokinetics/Pharmacodynamics models of veterinary antimicrobial agents.Journal of veterinary science · 2019Review
- Article
- Optimization of florfenicol dose against Piscirickettsia salmonis in Salmo salar through PK/PD studies.PloS one · 2019Article
- Article
- The pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modeling and cut-off values of tildipirosin againstOncotarget · 2018Article
- Similar Gastro-Intestinal Exposure to Florfenicol After Oral or Intramuscular Administration in Pigs, Leading to Resistance Selection in CommensalFrontiers in pharmacology · 2018Article
- PK-PD Integration Modeling and Cutoff Value of Florfenicol againstFrontiers in pharmacology · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) integration and modelling were used to predict dosage schedules for florfenicol for two pig pneumonia pathogens, Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae and Pasteurella multocida. Pharmacokinetic data were pooled for two bioequivalent products, pioneer and generic formulations, administered intramuscularly to pigs at a dose rate of 15 mg/kg. Antibacterial potency was determined in vitro as minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) and Mutant Prevention Concentration in broth and pig serum, for six isolates of each organism. For both organisms and for both serum and broth MICs, average concentration:MIC ratios over 48 h were similar and exceeded 2.5:1 and times greater than MIC exceeded 35 h. From in vitro time-kill curves, PK/PD modelling established serum breakpoint values for the index AUC24h/MIC for three levels of inhibition of growth, bacteriostasis and 3 and 4log10 reductions in bacterial count; means were 25.7, 40.2 and 47.0 h, respectively, for P. multocida and 24.6, 43.8 and 58.6 h for A. pleuropneumoniae. Using these PK and PD data, together with literature MIC distributions, doses for each pathogen were predicted for: (1) bacteriostatic and bactericidal levels of kill; (2) for 50 and 90% target attainment rates (TAR); and (3) for single dosing and daily dosing at steady state. Monte Carlo simulations for 90% TAR predicted single doses to achieve bacteriostatic and bactericidal actions over 48 h of 14.4 and 22.2 mg/kg (P. multocida) and 44.7 and 86.6 mg/kg (A. pleuropneumoniae). For daily doses at steady state, and 90% TAR bacteriostatic and bactericidal actions, dosages of 6.2 and 9.6 mg/kg (P. multocida) and 18.2 and 35.2 mg/kg (A. pleuropneumoniae) were required. PK/PD integration and modelling approaches to dose determination indicate the possibility of tailoring dose to a range of end-points.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.