ArticlePloS one2017
Criticality meets learning: Criticality signatures in a self-organizing recurrent neural network.
Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
33 citing papers in PubMed, 83 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effects of spatial constraints of inhibitory connectivity on the dynamical development of criticality in spiking networks.PLoS computational biology · 2026Article
- Boosting reservoir computing with brain-inspired adaptive control of E-I balance.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Dataset-Learning Duality and Emergent Criticality.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Detecting Signatures of Criticality Using Divergence Rate.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Article
- Collective dynamics and long-range order in thermal neuristor networks.Nature communications · 2024Article
- Tauopathy severely disrupts homeostatic set-points in emergent neural dynamics but not in the activity of individual neurons.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023Article
- Critical dynamics arise during structured information presentation within embodied in vitro neuronal networks.Nature communications · 2023Article
- Investigating structural and functional aspects of the brain's criticality in stroke.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- A systematic approach to brain dynamics: cognitive evolution theory of consciousness.Cognitive neurodynamics · 2023Article
- The fractal brain: scale-invariance in structure and dynamics.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2023Review
- Excitatory/inhibitory balance emerges as a key factor for RBN performance, overriding attractor dynamics.Frontiers in computational neuroscience · 2023Article
- Structural plasticity driven by task performance leads to criticality signatures in neuromorphic oscillator networks.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Theoretical foundations of studying criticality in the brain.Network neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2022Review
- Quasicriticality explains variability of human neural dynamics across life span.Frontiers in computational neuroscience · 2022Article
- Self-organized criticality as a framework for consciousness: A review study.Frontiers in psychology · 2022Article
- Hidden Hypergraphs, Error-Correcting Codes, and Critical Learning in Hopfield Networks.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Not One, but Many Critical States: A Dynamical Systems Perspective.Frontiers in neural circuits · 2021Article
- Stability of motor cortex network states during learning-associated neural reorganizations.Journal of neurophysiology · 2020Article
- Control of criticality and computation in spiking neuromorphic networks with plasticity.Nature communications · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Many experiments have suggested that the brain operates close to a critical state, based on signatures of criticality such as power-law distributed neuronal avalanches. In neural network models, criticality is a dynamical state that maximizes information processing capacities, e.g. sensitivity to input, dynamical range and storage capacity, which makes it a favorable candidate state for brain function. Although models that self-organize towards a critical state have been proposed, the relation between criticality signatures and learning is still unclear. Here, we investigate signatures of criticality in a self-organizing recurrent neural network (SORN). Investigating criticality in the SORN is of particular interest because it has not been developed to show criticality. Instead, the SORN has been shown to exhibit spatio-temporal pattern learning through a combination of neural plasticity mechanisms and it reproduces a number of biological findings on neural variability and the statistics and fluctuations of synaptic efficacies. We show that, after a transient, the SORN spontaneously self-organizes into a dynamical state that shows criticality signatures comparable to those found in experiments. The plasticity mechanisms are necessary to attain that dynamical state, but not to maintain it. Furthermore, onset of external input transiently changes the slope of the avalanche distributions - matching recent experimental findings. Interestingly, the membrane noise level necessary for the occurrence of the criticality signatures reduces the model's performance in simple learning tasks. Overall, our work shows that the biologically inspired plasticity and homeostasis mechanisms responsible for the SORN's spatio-temporal learning abilities can give rise to criticality signatures in its activity when driven by random input, but these break down under the structured input of short repeating sequences.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.