Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28552599›Full record

ArticleBehavioural brain research2017

Spectral and temporal properties of calls reveal deficits in ultrasonic vocalizations of adult Fmr1 knockout mice.

Samantha L Hodges, Suzanne O Nolan, Conner D Reynolds, Joaquin N Lugo

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Behavioural brain research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 72 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Distinct early development trajectories in Nf1Journal of neurodevelopmental disorders · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Behavioral Assays in the Study of Olfaction.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2025
    Article
  5. Neonatal immune stimulation results in sex-specific changes in ultrasonic vocalizations but does not affect seizure susceptibility in neonatal mice.International journal of developmental neuroscience : the official journal of the International Society for Developmental Neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. What do mammals have to say about the neurobiology of acoustic communication?Molecular psychology : brain, behavior, and society · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Samantha L HodgesInstitute of Biomedical Studies, Baylor University, Waco, TX 76798, USA.
Suzanne O NolanDepartment of Psychology and Neuroscience, Baylor University, Waco, TX 76798, USA.
Conner D ReynoldsDepartment of Psychology and Neuroscience, Baylor University, Waco, TX 76798, USA; Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, University of North Texas Health Science Center, Fort Worth, TX 76107, USA.
Joaquin N LugoInstitute of Biomedical Studies, Baylor University, Waco, TX 76798, USA; Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, Baylor University, Waco, TX 76798, USA. Electronic address: joaquin_lugo@baylor.edu.
Baylor University · US

Funding

Signaling Mechanisms Underlying Epilepsy and Autism CormorbidityR15NS088776 · NINDS · BAYLOR UNIVERSITY · PI JOAQUIN N LUGO · 2015 to 2026
$1.8M
NINDS NIH HHS R15 NS088776
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Fmr1 knockout (KO) mouse has commonly been used to investigate communication impairments, one of the key diagnostic symptoms observed in Fragile X syndrome (FXS) and Autism spectrum disorder (ASD). Many studies have found alterations in ultrasonic vocalizations (USVs) in neonatal Fmr1 KO mice, however, there is limited research investigating whether these deficits continue into adulthood. In the present study, we examine differences in female urine-induced ultrasonic vocalizations, scent marking behavior, odor discrimination, and open field activity in adult male Fmr1 KO and wildtype (WT) mice. Overall, we found extensive alterations between genotypes in both spectral and temporal properties of ultrasonic vocalizations. There was no difference in the average number of calls emitted by both genotypes, however, Fmr1 KO mice emitted calls of a higher frequency, decreased amplitude, and shorter duration than WT mice. Spectrographic analyses revealed statistically significant differences between genotypes in the types of calls emitted. Contrastingly, we found no differences in scent marking behavior, a form of social communication, or in odor discrimination and activity levels of the mice. The results corroborate previous studies emphasizing the importance of qualitative differences observed in vocalization behavior of Fmr1 KO mice, rather than quantitative measurements such as number of calls emitted. Overall, the study confirms the presence of abnormalities in vocalization behavior in adult Fmr1 KO mice that we believe are consistent with communication deficits seen in the syndrome.

Indexed as

Fragile X Messenger Ribonucleoprotein 1Fragile X SyndromeVocalization, AnimalAnalysis of VarianceAnimalsDiscrimination, PsychologicalDisease Models, AnimalMaleMice, KnockoutOlfactory PerceptionPhenotypeSexual Behavior, AnimalSound SpectrographyTime FactorsUrineFmr1 protein, mouseFragile X Messenger Ribonucleoprotein 1Communication deficitsFragile X syndromeFXSScent markingUltrasonic vocalizationsUSV

Identifiers

PMID28552599
PMCPMC6503674
OpenAlexW2619722132

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.