Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28552074›Full record

SynthesisCritical care (London, England)2017

Heat and moisture exchangers (HMEs) and heated humidifiers (HHs) in adult critically ill patients: a systematic review, meta-analysis and meta-regression of randomized controlled trials.

Maria Vargas, Davide Chiumello, Yuda Sutherasan, Lorenzo Ball, Antonio M Esquinas, Paolo Pelosi, Giuseppe Servillo

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Critical care (London, England), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. How can the collaboration between manufacturers of medical devices and bedside clinicians lead to improved applications of the devices?Canadian journal of respiratory therapy : CJRT = Revue canadienne de la therapie respiratoire : RCTR · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Humidification in the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit: What We Know, What We Need.Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine · 2025
    Article
  5. Effect of Heat and Moisture Exchanger vs Heated Humidifier on Ventilator-related Adverse Events in Children: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Tracheostomy care and decannulation during the COVID-19 pandemic. A multidisciplinary clinical practice guideline.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2021
    Review
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Maria VargasDepartment of Neurosciences, Reproductive and Odonthostomatological Sciences, University of Naples "Federico II", Naples, Italy. vargas.maria82@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7652-970X
Davide ChiumelloDipartimento di Emergenza - Urgenza, ASST Santi Paolo e Carlo; Dipartimento di Scienze della salute, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy.
Yuda SutherasanDivision of pulmonary and critical care medicine, Faculty of medicine Ramathibodi hospital, Mahidol University, 270 RAMA VI road, Bangkok, 10400, Thailand.
Lorenzo BallDepartment of Surgical Sciences and Integrated Diagnostics, AOU IRCCS San Martino- IST, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy.
Antonio M EsquinasIntensive Care Unit, Hospital Morales Meseguer, Murcia, Spain.
Paolo PelosiDepartment of Surgical Sciences and Integrated Diagnostics, AOU IRCCS San Martino- IST, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy.
Giuseppe ServilloDepartment of Neurosciences, Reproductive and Odonthostomatological Sciences, University of Naples "Federico II", Naples, Italy.
Istituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico · ITUniversity of Naples Federico II · ITHospital General Universitario Morales Meseguer · ESMahidol University · THUniversity of Milan · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe aims of this systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials are to evaluate the effects of active heated humidifiers (HHs) and moisture exchangers (HMEs) in preventing artificial airway occlusion and pneumonia, and on mortality in adult critically ill patients. In addition, we planned to perform a meta-regression analysis to evaluate the relationship between the incidence of artificial airway occlusion, pneumonia and mortality and clinical features of adult critically ill patients.

methodsComputerized databases were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing HHs and HMEs and reporting artificial airway occlusion, pneumonia and mortality as predefined outcomes. Relative risk (RR), 95% confidence interval for each outcome and I

resultsEighteen RCTs and 2442 adult critically ill patients were included in the analysis. The incidence of artificial airway occlusion (RR = 1.853; 95% CI 0.792-4.338), pneumonia (RR = 932; 95% CI 0.730-1.190) and mortality (RR = 1.023; 95% CI 0.878-1.192) were not different in patients treated with HMEs and HHs. However, in the subgroup analyses the incidence of airway occlusion was higher in HMEs compared with HHs with non-heated wire (RR = 3.776; 95% CI 1.560-9.143). According to the meta-regression, the effect size in the treatment group on artificial airway occlusion was influenced by the percentage of patients with pneumonia (β = -0.058; p = 0.027; favors HMEs in studies with high prevalence of pneumonia), and a trend was observed for an effect of the duration of mechanical ventilation (MV) (β = -0.108; p = 0.054; favors HMEs in studies with longer MV time).

conclusionsIn this meta-analysis we found no superiority of HMEs and HHs, in terms of artificial airway occlusion, pneumonia and mortality. A trend favoring HMEs was observed in studies including a high percentage of patients with pneumonia diagnosis at admission and those with prolonged MV. However, the choice of humidifiers should be made according to the clinical context, trying to avoid possible complications and reaching the appropriate performance at lower costs.

Indexed as

AdultAirway ManagementAirway ObstructionCritical IllnessEquipment DesignHot TemperatureHumansHumidifiersIncidenceRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRegression AnalysisRespiration, ArtificialArtificial airway occlusionHeat and moisture exchangersHeated humidifiersMortalityPneumonia

Identifiers

PMID28552074
PMCPMC5447307
OpenAlexW2619286966

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.