Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28551852›Full record

ArticleFolia microbiologica2018

Cultivable microscopic fungi from an underground chemosynthesis-based ecosystem: a preliminary study.

Alena Nováková, Vít Hubka, Šárka Valinová, Miroslav Kolařík, Alexandra Maria Hillebrand-Voiculescu

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Folia microbiologica, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Re-Identification ofMycobiology · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Taxonomy ofStudies in mycology · 2022
    Article
  6. A monograph ofStudies in mycology · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Fungal systematics and evolution · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Re-examination of species limits inStudies in mycology · 2021
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Fungal systematics and evolution · 2020
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Putting the Mess in Order:Frontiers in microbiology · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Alena NovákováLaboratory of Fungal Genetics and Metabolism, Institute of Microbiology AS CR, v.v.i, Vídeňská 1083, 142 20, Praha 4, Czech Republic. alena.novakova@biomed.cas.cz.
Vít HubkaLaboratory of Fungal Genetics and Metabolism, Institute of Microbiology AS CR, v.v.i, Vídeňská 1083, 142 20, Praha 4, Czech Republic.
Šárka ValinováDepartment of Botany, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Benátská 2, 128 01, Praha 2, Czech Republic.
Miroslav KolaříkLaboratory of Fungal Genetics and Metabolism, Institute of Microbiology AS CR, v.v.i, Vídeňská 1083, 142 20, Praha 4, Czech Republic.
Alexandra Maria Hillebrand-VoiculescuEmil Racoviţă Institute of Speleology, Str. Frumoasă, No. 31, Sect.1, 010986, Bucharest, Romania.

Funding

"BIOCEV - Biotechnology and Biomedicine Centre of the Academy of Sciences and Charles University" (CZ.1.05/1.1.00/02.0109)Grantová Agentura, Univerzita Karlova 1130214
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Movile Cave, a unique groundwater ecosystem in southern Romania, was discovered in 1986. This chemoautotrophic cave contains an abundant and diverse fauna with terrestrial and aquatic invertebrate communities, including 33 endemic species. Since its discovery, studies have focused mainly on cave chemoautotrophic bacteria, while the microfungal community has been largely neglected. In this study, we determined the microfungal species living on various substrates in Movile Cave and compared this spectrum with the mycobiota detected outside the cave (outside air-borne and soil-borne microfungi). To investigate all of the niches, we collected samples for two consecutive years from the dry part of the cave (cave air and sediment, corroded limestone walls, isopod feces, and isopod and spider cadavers) and from the post-siphon part of the cave, i.e., Airbell II (sediment and floating microbial mat). A total of 123 microfungal species were identified from among several hundred isolates. Of these, 96 species were only detected in the cave environment and not outside of the cave, while 90 species were from the dry part of the cave and 28 were from Airbell II. The most diverse genera were Penicillium (at least 18 species) and Aspergillus (14 species), followed by Cladosporium (9 species). Surprisingly, high CFU counts of air-borne microfungi were found inside the cave; they were even higher than outside the cave during the first year of investigation.

Indexed as

CavesChemoautotrophic GrowthEcosystemFungiMicroscopyPhylogeny

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.