Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28551851›Full record

ArticleJournal of neuro-oncology2017

The ratio of HLA-DR and VNN2

David C Soler, Andrew B Young, Kevin D Cooper, Amber Kerstetter-Fogle, Jill S Barnholtz-Sloan, Haley Gittleman, Thomas S McCormick, Andrew E Sloan

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neuro-oncology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

David C SolerDepartment of Neurological Surgery, University Hospitals-Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3804-563X
Andrew B YoungDepartment of Dermatology, University Hospitals-Cleveland Medical Center and the Case Western University School of Medicine, 11100 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH, 44106, USA.
Kevin D CooperDepartment of Dermatology, University Hospitals-Cleveland Medical Center and the Case Western University School of Medicine, 11100 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH, 44106, USA.
Amber Kerstetter-FogleDepartment of Neurological Surgery, University Hospitals-Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Jill S Barnholtz-SloanDepartment of Neurological Surgery, University Hospitals-Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Haley GittlemanCase Comprehensive Cancer Center, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Thomas S McCormickDepartment of Dermatology, University Hospitals-Cleveland Medical Center and the Case Western University School of Medicine, 11100 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH, 44106, USA.
Andrew E SloanDepartment of Neurological Surgery, University Hospitals-Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, USA. Andrew.Sloan@uhhospitals.org.

Funding

Vitamin D endocrine system and Protection Against Skin TumorlgenesisP30AR039750 · NIAMS · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI COOPER, KEVIN D · 1988 to 2015
$9.1M
NIAMS NIH HHS P30 AR039750
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most aggressive and lethal type of brain cancer with a median survival of less than two years even following aggressive treatment (Stupp et al., N Engl J Med 352:987-996, 2005). Among the many challenges in treating patients with this devastating disease is the ability to differentiate Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) images that appear following radiation therapy, often termed "radiation necrosis" from true GBM recurrence. Radiation necrosis (RN) and GBM are very difficult to distinguish and currently only a brain biopsy can conclusively differentiate these pathologies. In the present study, we introduce a differential diagnostic approach using a newly identified Myeloid-Derived Suppressor Cell (MDSC) biomarker, vascular non-inflammatory molecule 2 (VNN2

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overAmidohydrolasesBiopsyBrain NeoplasmsCell Adhesion MoleculesCohort StudiesDacarbazineFemaleFlow CytometryGlioblastomaGPI-Linked ProteinsHLA-DR AntigensHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingAmidohydrolasesCell Adhesion MoleculesDacarbazineGPI-Linked ProteinsHLA-DR AntigensTemozolomideVNN2 protein, humanBrain tumorsGlioblastomaLiquid biopsyMDSCVNN2

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.