ReviewCurrent hypertension reports2017
Clinical Implications of Different Blood Pressure Measurement Techniques.
Review in Current hypertension reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03862742 (Role of Wrist Based Blood Pressure Monitoring in Clinical Practice), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Role of Wrist Based Blood Pressure Monitoring in Clinical Practice
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Current status of elevated blood pressure and hypertension among adolescents in Asia: a systematic review.Journal of global health · 2025Pooled it
- Quality in screening and measuring blood pressure in China's primary health care: a national cross-sectional study using unannounced standardized patients.The Lancet regional health. Western Pacific · 2024Article
- Low Concordance Between Blood Pressures Measured in Periodic Health Examinations and in a Workplace-Based Hypertension Management Program.Phenomics (Cham, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Clinical implications of central blood pressure measured by radial tonometry and automated office blood pressure measured using automatic devices in cardiovascular diseases.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2022Article
- Concordance Between Blood Pressure in the Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial and in Routine Clinical Practice.JAMA internal medicine · 2020Observational
- Blood Pressure Measurement: A KDOQI Perspective.American journal of kidney diseases : the official journal of the National Kidney Foundation · 2020Review
- Intensive vs Standard Blood Pressure Control in Adults 80 Years or Older: A Secondary Analysis of the Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial.Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · 2020Article
- BP Measurement in Clinical Practice: Time to SPRINT to Guideline-Recommended Protocols.Journal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN · 2018Review
- Masked Hypertension.Current hypertension reports · 2017Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purpose of reviewThe appropriate treatment targets for individuals with elevated blood pressure (BP) have received increased attention in light of recent clinical trial results. However, it is well known that the method used to measure BP can have a significant impact on the observed BP. In this review, we summarize the existing literature on the impact of BP measurement technique on observed BP readings. RECENT
findingsManual BPs obtained in-clinic routinely differ from those obtained using automated devices. Further, clinic-based readings (either manual or automated) typically correlate poorly with readings from ambulatory BP monitoring or home-based devices. However, few studies utilize randomization or sound experimental design to explore differences in BP readings by method or technique. While numerous studies report differences in BP by method, most lack statistical rigor and therefore provide limited insight into the true effect of technique on BP measurements.
Indexed as
Identifiers
28551831What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.