Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28550611›Full record

SynthesisEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging2017

Ana María García Vicente, Roberto C Delgado-Bolton, Mariano Amo-Salas, Jesús López-Fidalgo, Ana Paula Caresia Aróztegui, José Ramón García Garzón, Javier Orcajo Rincón, María José García Velloso, María de Arcocha Torres, Soledad Alvárez Ruíz and 1 more

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2019
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Anti-Kelch-like protein 11 antibody encephalitis presenting with progressive cognitive deficits in an older woman: a case report and literature review.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2025
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Autoimmune Encephalitis and Related Syndromes.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. World journal of nuclear medicine
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.

Ana María García VicenteNuclear Medicine Department, University General Hospital, C/ Obispo Rafael Torija s/n, 13005, Ciudad Real, Spain. angarvice@yahoo.es.
Roberto C Delgado-BoltonDepartment of Diagnostic Imaging (Radiology) and Nuclear Medicine, San Pedro Hospital and Centre for Biomedical Research of La Rioja (CIBIR), University of La Rioja, Logroño, Spain.
Mariano Amo-SalasDepartment of Mathematics, University of Castilla-La Mancha, Ciudad Real, Spain.
Jesús López-FidalgoUniversidad de Navarra, ICS, Unidad de Estadística, Campus Universitario, 31080, Pamplona, Spain.
Ana Paula Caresia ArózteguiNuclear Medicine Department, Parc Taulí Hospital Universitari, Sabadell, Barcelona, Spain.
José Ramón García GarzónUnitat PET/TC CETIR-ERESA, Barcelona, Spain.
Javier Orcajo RincónNuclear Medicine Department, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain.
María José García VellosoNuclear Medicine Department, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain.
María de Arcocha TorresNuclear Medicine Department, Hospital Universitario Marques de Valdecilla, Santander, Spain.
Soledad Alvárez RuízNuclear Medicine Department, Hospital Universitario Miguel Servet, Zaragoza, Spain.
Oncology Task Force of Spanish Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging
Endesa (Spain) · ESMarqués de Valdecilla University Hospital · ESUniversidad de La Rioja · ESCorporació Sanitària Parc Taulí · ESHospital General Universitario de Ciudad Real · ESHospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón · ESHospital Universitario Miguel Servet · ESUniversity of Castilla-La Mancha · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe detection of occult cancer in patients suspected of having a paraneoplastic neurological syndrome (PNS) poses a diagnostic challenge. The aim of our study was to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the diagnostic performance of FDG PET for the detection of occult malignant disease responsible for PNS.

methodsA systematic review of the literature (MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane, and DARE) was undertaken to identify studies published in any language. The search strategy was structured after addressing clinical questions regarding the validity or usefulness of the test, following the PICO framework. Inclusion criteria were studies involving patients with PNS in whom FDG PET was performed to detect malignancy, and which reported sufficient primary data to allow calculation of diagnostic accuracy parameters. When possible, a meta-analysis was performed to calculate the joint sensitivity, specificity, and detection rate for malignancy (with 95% confidence intervals [CIs]), as well as a subgroup analysis based on patient characteristics (antibodies, syndrome).

resultsThe comprehensive literature search revealed 700 references. Sixteen studies met the inclusion criteria and were ultimately selected. Most of the studies were retrospective (12/16). For the quality assessment, the QUADAS-2 tool was applied to assess the risk of bias. Across 16 studies (793 patients), the joint sensitivity, specificity, and detection rate for malignancy with FDG PET were 0.87 (95% CI: 0.80-0.93), 0.86 (95% CI: 0.83-0.89), and 14.9% (95% CI: 11.5-18.7), respectively. The area under the curve (AUC) of the summary ROC curve was 0.917. Homogeneity of results was observed for sensitivity but not for specificity. Some of the individual studies showed large 95% CIs as a result of small sample size.

conclusionsThe results of our meta-analysis reveal high diagnostic performance of FDG PET in the detection of malignancy responsible for PNS, not affected by the presence of onconeural antibodies or clinical characteristics.

Indexed as

Fluorodeoxyglucose F18HumansParaneoplastic Syndromes, Nervous SystemPositron-Emission TomographyFluorodeoxyglucose F1818F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomographyMeta-analysisParaneoplastic neurological syndromeSystematic review

Identifiers

PMID28550611
OpenAlexW2618425376

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.