ArticleThe European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care2018
Cost-effectiveness of combined serum anti-Helicobacter pylori IgG antibody and serum pepsinogen concentrations for screening for gastric cancer risk in Japan.
Article in The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.
- Guidelines for the management of Helicobacter pylori infection in Japan: 2024 revised edition.Journal of gastroenterology · 2026Guideline
- Economic Evaluation of Gastric Cancer Screening Strategies: A Systematic Review.Journal of gastrointestinal cancer · 2025Pooled it
- Estimation of Cost for Endoscopic Screening for Esophageal Cancer in a High-Risk Population in Rural China: Results from a Population-Level Randomized Controlled Trial.PharmacoEconomics · 2019Trial
- Biomarkers in Gastric Cancer: Blood Biomarkers, Liquid Biopsy, Artificial Intelligence, and Risk-Stratified Care.Cancers · 2026Review
- Validation of the ABC Method for Gastric Cancer Risk Stratification Across Helicobacter pylori Infections With Diverse CagA Status and Subtypes in Brazil.Cancer medicine · 2025Article
- Cost-Effectiveness of Empagliflozin in CKD with or without Albuminuria.Clinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology : CJASN · 2025Article
- Review
- Clinical Characteristics of Patients With Previous Helicobacter pylori Infection-Induced Atrophic Gastritis.Cureus · 2024Article
- Current status of early gastric cancer screening research.Cancer biology & medicine · 2024Article
- Health economic evaluation on population-basedChinese journal of cancer research = Chung-kuo yen cheng yen chiu · 2023Article
- Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Hp and New Gastric Cancer Screening Scoring System for Screening and Prevention of Gastric Cancer.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2023Article
- Cost-effectiveness of adding aEnvironmental and occupational health practice · 2023Article
- A non-invasive combined strategy to improve the appropriateness of upper gastrointestinal endoscopy.Acta bio-medica : Atenei Parmensis · 2022Article
- Clinical Benefit and Cost Effectiveness of Risk-Stratified Gastric Cancer Screening Strategies in China: A Modeling Study.PharmacoEconomics · 2022Article
- Risk factors for gastric cancer in Japan in the 2010s: a large, long-term observational study.Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association · 2022Observational
- Human gastric cancer risk screening: From rat pepsinogen studies to the ABC method.Proceedings of the Japan Academy. Series B, Physical and biological sciences · 2021Article
- Effect and cost-effectiveness of national gastric cancer screening in Japan: a microsimulation modeling study.BMC medicine · 2020Article
- Decision model analyses of upper endoscopy for gastric cancer screening and preneoplasia surveillance: a systematic review.Therapeutic advances in gastroenterology · 2020Review
- Gastric Cancer Screening by Combined Determination of SerumChinese medical journal · 2018Review
- Assessing the value of screening tools: reviewing the challenges and opportunities of cost-effectiveness analysis.Public health reviews · 2018Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundA combination of assays for the presence of serum anti-Helicobacter pylori IgG antibody (HPA) and serum pepsinogen (PG) concentrations can be used to screen for gastric cancer risk. In Japan, this "ABC method" is considered an effective means of stratifying gastric cancer risk. This study aimed to ascertain its cost-effectiveness for assessing gastric cancer risk.
methodsA Markov model was constructed to compare the cost-effectiveness of two strategies for gastric cancer-risk screening over a 30-year period: the ABC method, which uses a combination of assessing the presence of HPA and measuring serum PG concentrations and scheduling endoscopies accordingly, and annual endoscopic screening. Clinical and epidemiological data on variables in the model were obtained from published reports. Analyses were made from the perspective of the Japanese health care payer.
resultsAccording to base-case analysis, the ABC method cost less than annual endoscopic screening (64,489 vs. 64,074 USD) and saved more lives (18.16 vs. 18.30 quality-adjusted life years). One-way analyses confirmed the robustness of the cost-effectiveness results. The probability that the ABC method is cost-effective in Japanese individuals aged 50 years was 0.997.
conclusionsA combination of HPA and serum PG assays, plus scheduling endoscopy accordingly, is a cost-effective method of screening for gastric cancer risk in Japan.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.