ArticleInternational orthopaedics2017
Partial component-retained two-stage reconstruction for chronic infection after uncemented total hip arthroplasty: results of sixteen cases after five years of follow-up.
Article in International orthopaedics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.
- Success Rate of Partial Two-Stage Exchange Arthroplasty for Late Chronic Periprosthetic Joint Infections in Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Meta-Analysis.Hip & pelvis · 2026Article
- Clinical Outcomes of Partial Two-Stage Revision with Femoral Stem Retention in Elderly Patients with Hip Periprosthetic Joint Infection.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Partial Two-Stage Exchange for Infected Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Treatment to Take into Account.Journal of personalized medicine · 2023Article
- Article
- Partial two-stage exchange: an alternative method for infected total hip arthroplasty.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2021Article
- Progress of antibiotic-loaded bone cement in joint arthroplasty.Chinese medical journal · 2020Article
- Cemented versus uncemented total hip replacement for femoral neck fractures in elderly patients: a retrospective, multicentre study with a mean 5-year follow-up.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2020Article
- Uncemented versus cemented total hip arthroplasty for displaced femoral neck fractures in elderly patients with osteoporosis: A retrospective analysis.The Journal of international medical research · 2020Article
- Partial implant retention in two-stage exchange for chronic infected total hip arthroplasty.International orthopaedics · 2020Article
- Staged Revision of Infected-hip Arthroplasty Using an Antibiotics-loaded Intra-articular Cement Spacer: Impact on Cemented and Cementless Stem Retention.Hip & pelvis · 2020Article
- Hip Spacers in Two-Stage Revision for Periprosthetic Joint Infection: A Review of Literature.Joints · 2019Review
- A new perspective on current prosthetic joint infection classifications: introducing topography as a key factor affecting treatment strategy.Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery · 2019Article
- Hip and Knee Section, Treatment, Surgical Technique: Proceedings of International Consensus on Orthopedic Infections.The Journal of arthroplasty · 2019Article
- Citations, non-citations and visibility of International Orthopaedics in 2017.International orthopaedics · 2018Article
- Partial component-retained two-stage reconstruction for chronic infection after uncemented total hip arthroplasty: good or bad?International orthopaedics · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTwo-stage reconstruction with total implant removal and re-implantation after infection control is considered the gold standard treatment for infection after hip arthroplasty. However, removal of the well-fixed stem or cup may cause substantial bone loss and other complications, thereby making reconstruction difficult. We evaluated whether an infection post total hip arthroplasty can be treated without removal of the radiographically and clinically well-fixed femoral stem or acetabular cup.
methodsPatients with a chronic infection after total hip arthroplasty, with a radiographically well-fixed, cementless stem or cup, were selected. During the first surgical stage, we retained the stem or cup if we were unable to remove these with a stem or cup extractor. An antibiotic-impregnated cement spacer was then implanted. After control of infection (C-reactive protein level within normal value), we performed the second stage of re-implantation surgery. Treatment failure was defined as uncontrolled infection requiring removal of the retained implant.
resultsFrom January 2004 to December 2013, 16 patients underwent partial component-retained two stage reconstruction. Thirteen patients (81.3%) were free of infection, with a mean follow-up time of five years. The remaining three patients, who had high-risk comorbidities and, of whom, two were infected by high-virulence organisms, had uncontrolled infection and required further surgery to remove the retained implant.
conclusionsPartial component-retained two-stage reconstruction could be an alternative treatment option for chronic infection after an uncemented total hip arthroplasty with a radiographically and clinically well-fixed component in selected patients, who are not immunocompromised and are infected by a low-virulence organism.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.