Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28550428›Full record

ArticleInternational orthopaedics2017

Partial component-retained two-stage reconstruction for chronic infection after uncemented total hip arthroplasty: results of sixteen cases after five years of follow-up.

Kun-Hui Chen, Shang-Wen Tsai, Po-Kuei Wu, Cheng-Fong Chen, Hsin-Yi Wang, Wei-Ming Chen

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International orthopaedics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kun-Hui ChenDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, No 201, Sec 2, Shipai Rd, Beitou District, Taipei, Taiwan, 11217, Republic of China.
Shang-Wen TsaiDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, No 201, Sec 2, Shipai Rd, Beitou District, Taipei, Taiwan, 11217, Republic of China.
Po-Kuei WuDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, No 201, Sec 2, Shipai Rd, Beitou District, Taipei, Taiwan, 11217, Republic of China.
Cheng-Fong ChenDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, No 201, Sec 2, Shipai Rd, Beitou District, Taipei, Taiwan, 11217, Republic of China.
Hsin-Yi WangDepartment of Surgery, School of Medicine, National Yang-Ming University, No.155, Sec.2, Linong Street, Beitou District, Taipei, Taiwan, 11217, Republic of China.
Wei-Ming ChenDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, No 201, Sec 2, Shipai Rd, Beitou District, Taipei, Taiwan, 11217, Republic of China. wmc2499@gmail.com.
National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University · TWTaipei Veterans General Hospital · TW

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTwo-stage reconstruction with total implant removal and re-implantation after infection control is considered the gold standard treatment for infection after hip arthroplasty. However, removal of the well-fixed stem or cup may cause substantial bone loss and other complications, thereby making reconstruction difficult. We evaluated whether an infection post total hip arthroplasty can be treated without removal of the radiographically and clinically well-fixed femoral stem or acetabular cup.

methodsPatients with a chronic infection after total hip arthroplasty, with a radiographically well-fixed, cementless stem or cup, were selected. During the first surgical stage, we retained the stem or cup if we were unable to remove these with a stem or cup extractor. An antibiotic-impregnated cement spacer was then implanted. After control of infection (C-reactive protein level within normal value), we performed the second stage of re-implantation surgery. Treatment failure was defined as uncontrolled infection requiring removal of the retained implant.

resultsFrom January 2004 to December 2013, 16 patients underwent partial component-retained two stage reconstruction. Thirteen patients (81.3%) were free of infection, with a mean follow-up time of five years. The remaining three patients, who had high-risk comorbidities and, of whom, two were infected by high-virulence organisms, had uncontrolled infection and required further surgery to remove the retained implant.

conclusionsPartial component-retained two-stage reconstruction could be an alternative treatment option for chronic infection after an uncemented total hip arthroplasty with a radiographically and clinically well-fixed component in selected patients, who are not immunocompromised and are infected by a low-virulence organism.

Indexed as

AgedAnti-Bacterial AgentsArthritis, InfectiousArthroplasty, Replacement, HipChronic DiseaseDevice RemovalFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHip JointHip ProsthesisHumansMaleMiddle AgedProsthesis-Related InfectionsReoperationRetrospective StudiesAnti-Bacterial AgentsArthroplastyHip replacementPeriprosthetic joint infection

Identifiers

PMID28550428
OpenAlexW2619025057

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.