Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28550377›Full record

Trial reportAIDS and behavior2018

Acceptability of and Adherence to an Antiretroviral-Based Vaginal Microbicide among Pregnant Women in the United States.

Elizabeth T Montgomery, Lisa M Noguchi, James Y Dai, Jason Pan, Joseph Biggio, Craig Hendrix, Karen Isaacs, D Heather Watts, Jill L Schwartz, Jeanna Piper and 1 more

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in AIDS and behavior, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Development of a mucoinert progesterone nanosuspension for safer and more effective prevention of preterm birth.Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society · 2019
    Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Elizabeth T MontgomeryRTI International, 351 California St, Suite 500, San Francisco, CA, 94104, USA. emontgomery@rti.org.
Lisa M NoguchiMagee-Womens Research Institute, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
James Y DaiStatistical Center for HIV/AIDS Research and Prevention (SCHARP), Seattle, WA, USA.
Jason PanStatistical Center for HIV/AIDS Research and Prevention (SCHARP), Seattle, WA, USA.
Joseph BiggioUniveristy of Alabama, Birmingham, AL, USA.
Craig HendrixJohns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Karen IsaacsFHI360, Durham, NC, USA.
D Heather WattsNICHD, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Jill L SchwartzCONRAD, Eastern Virginia Medical School, Arlington, VA, USA.
Jeanna PiperDAIDS, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Richard BeigiMagee-Womens Research Institute, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.

Funding

Translational Bioimaging Core Shared ResourceP30CA015704 · NCI · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI Eric Collisson · 1985 to 2026
$296.4M
Microbicide Trials NetworkUM1AI068633 · NIAID · MAGEE-WOMEN'S RES INST AND FOUNDATION · PI HILLIER, SHARON L. · 2011 to 2021
$175.0M
Statistical and Data Management Center (SDMC): Microbicide Trials NetworkUM1AI068615 · NIAID · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI BROWN, ELIZABETH RENATA · 2011 to 2021
$66.5M
University of Pittsburgh Clinical Trials UnitUM1AI069494 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI SUSAN L KOLETAR, John W Mellors · 2012 to 2026
$38.0M
Laboratory Center (LC): Microbicide Trials NetworkUM1AI106707 · NIAID · MAGEE-WOMEN'S RES INST AND FOUNDATION · PI MELLORS, JOHN W, ROHAN, LISA CENCIA · 2014 to 2021
$27.1M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA015704NIAID NIH HHS UM1 AI068615NIAID NIH HHS UM1 AI068633NIAID NIH HHS UM1 AI069494NIAID NIH HHS UM1 AI106707
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The MTN-008 trial was the first multi-dose study conducted to evaluate the safety of a microbicide gel (2:1 randomized to tenofovir 1% or hydroxycellulose (HEC) placebo gel) during pregnancy. The study aim was to evaluate safety, tolerability and pharmacokinetics of the study products. Procedures included daily gel administration, with Day 0 and Day 6 in clinic, and Days 1-5 at home. Because pregnancy may pose unique challenges to consistent gel use and acceptability, evaluation of adherence and acceptability was a secondary objective of the trial. The study enrolled healthy, HIV-negative, pregnant women aged 18-40 in Pittsburgh, PA and Birmingham, AL, USA in 2 consecutive groups: cohort 1 was 37-39 weeks gestation, cohort 2 was 34-36 weeks. Ninety-one women completed the study (45 and 46 in each cohort, respectively) and were evaluable per protocol. Adherence was evaluated using self-reports: participants completed a web-based computer-assisted self-interview (CASI) at Days 0 and 6 about gel attitudes and behaviors. At Day 6 trained research staff conducted a short interviewer-administered questionnaire with both structured and open-ended questions. Frequencies of quantitative data were tabulated in SAS and descriptive statistics are presented; open-ended textual data were summarized by a behavioral scientist experienced in qualitative analysis. Participants reported generally neutral perceptions of gel characteristics. A small number of women (7-8%) reported pain (6/90), other physical discomfort (7/90), or mental discomfort (7/90) associated with the process of applicator insertion. About 5% reported the same for the gel itself. Two-thirds (61/90) thought the gel was runny, many complained of bothersome gel leakage and several cited this reason for not inserting a full dose. The majority were not worried the gel would cause problems for their pregnancy or babies. Ninety-seven percent (83/86) said they would use the gel in the future if they were pregnant, and 90% (81/90) when nonpregnant. Self-reported adherence was high with 88% (79/90) reporting daily gel use on both the computerized and interviewer-administered questionnaires. The majority (67/90) reported no difficulty with daily use. However, drug was undetectable (<0.31 ng/mL) among 45% (27/60; 95% CI 32-58%) of the women on active product prior to observed dosing at Day 6. The most common reason for reported nonuse (N = 6) was forgetting. Study gel was generally acceptable, but many complained of a runny consistency (61/90) and leakage (83/90). No frequent or strong concerns about the effects of the study gel on the pregnancy/fetus were reported. Self-reported adherence to study gel self-administered at home for 5 days was high, however plasma drug levels suggest actual use may have been considerably lower. Findings from this study can provide insights relevant to use of other antiretroviral-based, vaginally-inserted HIV prevention methods during pregnancy.

Indexed as

Medication AdherenceAdministration, IntravaginalAdolescentAdultAlabamaAnti-Infective AgentsAnti-Retroviral AgentsCohort StudiesFemaleHIV InfectionsHumansPatient Acceptance of Health CarePhiladelphiaPregnancyPregnant PeopleTenofovirAnti-Infective AgentsAnti-Retroviral AgentsTenofovirVaginal Creams, Foams, and JelliesBreastfeedingHIV preventionMicrobicidePregnantTenofovir

Identifiers

PMID28550377
PMCPMC5702586

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.