Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28550310›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2017

A-to-I editing in human miRNAs is enriched in seed sequence, influenced by sequence contexts and significantly hypoedited in glioblastoma multiforme.

Deepanjan Paul, Ashis Narayan Sinha, Arjun Ray, Megha Lal, Subhashree Nayak, Anchal Sharma, Bharati Mehani, Debasish Mukherjee, Saurabh V Laddha, Ashish Suri and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. RBPs: an RNA editor's choice.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2024
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. RNA modifications in cancer.British journal of cancer · 2023
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Deepanjan PaulGenomics & Molecular Medicine Unit, CSIR-Institute of Genomics & Integrative Biology, Delhi, India.
Ashis Narayan SinhaGenomics & Molecular Medicine Unit, CSIR-Institute of Genomics & Integrative Biology, Delhi, India.
Arjun RayGenomics & Molecular Medicine Unit, CSIR-Institute of Genomics & Integrative Biology, Delhi, India.ORCID 0000-0002-6020-5863
Megha LalGenomics & Molecular Medicine Unit, CSIR-Institute of Genomics & Integrative Biology, Delhi, India.
Subhashree NayakDepartment of Pathology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Delhi, India.
Anchal SharmaGenomics & Molecular Medicine Unit, CSIR-Institute of Genomics & Integrative Biology, Delhi, India.
Bharati MehaniGenomics & Molecular Medicine Unit, CSIR-Institute of Genomics & Integrative Biology, Delhi, India.
Debasish MukherjeeGenomics & Molecular Medicine Unit, CSIR-Institute of Genomics & Integrative Biology, Delhi, India.ORCID 0000-0002-0158-0700
Saurabh V LaddhaGenomics & Molecular Medicine Unit, CSIR-Institute of Genomics & Integrative Biology, Delhi, India.
Ashish SuriDepartment of Neurosurgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Delhi, India.
Chitra SarkarDepartment of Pathology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Delhi, India.
Arijit MukhopadhyayGenomics & Molecular Medicine Unit, CSIR-Institute of Genomics & Integrative Biology, Delhi, India. a.mukhopadhyay@salford.ac.uk.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Editing in microRNAs, particularly in seed can significantly alter the choice of their target genes. We show that out of 13 different human tissues, different regions of brain showed higher adenosine to inosine (A-to-I) editing in mature miRNAs. These events were enriched in seed sequence (73.33%), which was not observed for cytosine to uracil (17.86%) editing. More than half of the edited miRNAs showed increased stability, 72.7% of which had ΔΔG values less than -6.0 Kcal/mole and for all of them the edited adenosines mis-paired with cytosines on the pre-miRNA structure. A seed-editing event in hsa-miR-411 (with A - C mismatch) lead to increased expression of the mature form compared to the unedited version in cell culture experiments. Further, small RNA sequencing of GBM patients identified significant miRNA hypoediting which correlated with downregulation of ADAR2 both in metadata and qRT-PCR based validation. Twenty-two significant (11 novel) A-to-I hypoediting events were identified in GBM samples. This study highlights the importance of specific sequence and structural requirements of pre-miRNA for editing along with a suggestive crucial role for ADAR2. Enrichment of A-to-I editing in seed sequence highlights this as an important layer for genomic regulation in health and disease, especially in human brain.

Indexed as

Gene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticRNA EditingAdenosineAdenosine DeaminaseAutopsyBase PairingBrain NeoplasmsCase-Control StudiesCorpus CallosumFrontal LobeGene LibraryGlioblastomaGray MatterHEK293 CellsHumansInosineADARB1 protein, humanAdenosineAdenosine DeaminaseInosineMicroRNAsRNA-Binding Proteins

Identifiers

PMID28550310
PMCPMC5446428

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.