Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28550174›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology2017

Variability in coronary artery anatomy affects consistency of cardiac damage after myocardial infarction in mice.

Jiqiu Chen, Delaine K Ceholski, Lifan Liang, Kenneth Fish, Roger J Hajjar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Guidelines for in vivo mouse models of myocardial infarction.American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology · 2021
    Guideline
  2. Guidelines for measuring cardiac physiology in mice.American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology · 2018
    Guideline
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jiqiu ChenCardiovascular Research Center, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York.
Delaine K CeholskiCardiovascular Research Center, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York.
Lifan LiangCardiovascular Research Center, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York.
Kenneth FishCardiovascular Research Center, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York.
Roger J HajjarCardiovascular Research Center, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York roger.hajjar@mssm.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Low reliability and reproducibility in heart failure models are well established. The purpose of the present study is to explore factors that affect model consistency of myocardial infarction (MI) in mice. MI was induced by left coronary artery (LCA) ligation. The coronary artery was casted with resin and visualized with fluorescent imaging ex vivo. LCA characteristics and MI size were analyzed individually in each animal, and MI size was correlated with left ventricular (LV) function by echocardiography. Coronary anatomy varies widely in mice, posing challenges for surgical ligation and resulting in inconsistent MI size postligation. The length of coronary arterial trunk, level of bifurcation, number of branches, and territory supplied by these branches are unique in each animal. When the main LCA trunk is ligated, this results in a large MI, but when a single branch is ligated, MI size is variable due to differing levels of LCA ligation and area supplied by the branches. During the ligation procedure, nearly 40% of LCAs are not grossly visible to the surgeon. In these situations, the surgeon blindly sutures a wider and deeper area of tissue in an attempt to catch the LCA. Paradoxically, these situations have greater odds of resulting in smaller MIs. In conclusion, variation in MI size and LV function after LCA ligation in mice is difficult to avoid. Anatomic diversity of the LCA in mice leads to inconsistency in MI size and functional parameters, and this is independent of potential technical modifications made by the operator.

Indexed as

AnimalsCoronary Vessel AnomaliesCoronary VesselsDisease Models, AnimalLigationMaleMice, Inbred C57BLMyocardial InfarctionMyocardiumOptical ImagingPhenotypeReplica TechniquesStroke VolumeVentricular Function, Leftanatomycoronary arterydiversityejection fractionmyocardial infarction

Identifiers

PMID28550174
PMCPMC5582916

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.