Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28550080›Full record

Trial reportClinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology : CJASN2017

Two phosphAte taRGets in End-stage renal disease Trial (TARGET): A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Ron Wald, Christian G Rabbat, Louis Girard, Amit X Garg, Karthik Tennankore, Jessica Tyrwhitt, Andrew Smyth, Andrea Rathe-Skafel, Peggy Gao, Andrea Mazzetti and 5 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Clinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology : CJASN, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. The effects of elevated phosphate on the kidney - damaging the gatekeeper.Pflugers Archiv : European journal of physiology · 2026
    Review
  5. "Hi"s and "Lo"s of Targeting Serum Phosphate Levels in Hemodialysis.Journal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Design and Rationale of HiLo: A Pragmatic, Randomized Trial of Phosphate Management for Patients Receiving Maintenance Hemodialysis.American journal of kidney diseases : the official journal of the National Kidney Foundation · 2021
    Article
  13. Review
  14. State-of-the-Art Management of Hyperphosphatemia in Patients With CKD: An NKF-KDOQI Controversies Perspective.American journal of kidney diseases : the official journal of the National Kidney Foundation · 2021
    Article
  15. Impact of longer term phosphorus control on cardiovascular mortality in hemodialysis patients using an area under the curve approach: results from the DOPPS.Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association · 2020
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 8 institutions in 2 countries.

Ron WaldDivisions of Nephrology and.
Christian G RabbatDivision of Nephrology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Louis GirardDepartment of Medicine and Libin Cardiovascular Institute and.
Amit X GargDivision of Nephrology, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.
Karthik TennankoreDivision of Nephrology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.
Jessica TyrwhittPopulation Health Research Institute, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada; and.
Andrew SmythPopulation Health Research Institute, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada; and.
Andrea Rathe-SkafelDivisions of Nephrology and.
Peggy GaoPopulation Health Research Institute, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada; and.
Andrea MazzettiPopulation Health Research Institute, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada; and.
Jackie BoschPopulation Health Research Institute, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada; and.
Andrew T YanCardiology, St. Michael's Hospital and University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Patrick ParfreyDivision of Nephrology, Memorial University, St. John's, Newfoundland, Canada.
Braden J MannsDepartment of Medicine and Libin Cardiovascular Institute and.
Michael WalshDivision of Nephrology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Pediatric Nephrology of Alabama · USPopulation Health Research Institute · CASt. Michael's Hospital · CADalhousie University · CAMcMaster University · CAMemorial University of Newfoundland · CAUniversity of Calgary · CAWestern University · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectivesHyperphosphatemia is common among recipients of maintenance dialysis and is associated with a higher risk of mortality and cardiovascular events. A large randomized trial is needed to determine whether lowering phosphate concentrations with binders improves patient-important outcomes. To inform such an effort we conducted a pilot randomized controlled trial. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: We conducted a randomized controlled trial of prevalent hemodialysis recipients already receiving calcium carbonate as a phosphate binder at five Canadian centers between March 31, 2014 and October 2, 2014. Participants were randomly allocated to 26 weeks of an intensive phosphate goal of 2.33-4.66 mg/dl (0.75-1.50 mmol/L) or a liberalized target of 6.20-7.75 mg/dl (2.00-2.50 mmol/L) by titrating calcium carbonate using a dosing nomogram. The primary outcome was the difference in the change in serum phosphate from randomization to 26 weeks.

resultsFifty-three participants were randomized to the intensive group and 51 to the liberalized group. The median (interquartile range) daily dose of elemental calcium at 26 weeks was 1800 (1275-3000) mg in the intensive group, and 0 (0-500) mg in the liberalized group. The mean (SD) serum phosphate at 26 weeks was 4.53 (1.12) mg/dl (1.46 [0.36] mmol/L) in the intensive group and 6.05 (1.40) mg/dl (1.95 [0.45] mmol/L) in the liberalized group. Phosphate concentration in the intensive group declined by 1.24 (95% confidence interval, 0.75 to 1.74) mg/dl (0.40 [95% confidence interval, 0.24 to 0.56] mmol/L) compared with the liberalized group. There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups in the risk of hypercalcemia, hypocalcemia, parathyroidectomy, or major vascular events.

conclusionsIt is feasible to achieve and maintain a difference in serum phosphate concentrations in hemodialysis recipients by titrating calcium carbonate. A large trial is needed to determine if targeting a lower serum phosphate concentration improves patient-important outcomes.

Indexed as

Renal DialysisAgedBiomarkersCalcium CarbonateCanadaChelating AgentsDrug Dosage CalculationsDrug MonitoringFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansHyperphosphatemiaKidney Failure, ChronicMaleMiddle AgedNomogramsBiomarkersCalcium CarbonateChelating AgentsPhosphatesCalcium CarbonateCalcium, DietaryCanadaGoalsHemodialysisHumansHypercalcemiahyperphosphatemiaHypocalcemiaKidney Failure, ChronicNomogramsParathyroidectomyphosphate bindersPhosphatesPilotsPrevalenceRandom Allocationrandomized controlled trialsrenal dialysisrenal insufficiency, chronic

Identifiers

PMID28550080
PMCPMC5460712
OpenAlexW2618773451

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.