Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28549765›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American College of Surgeons2017

Improving Patient-Centered Transitional Care after Complex Abdominal Surgery.

Alexandra W Acher, Stephanie A Campbell-Flohr, Maria Brenny-Fitzpatrick, Kristine M Leahy-Gross, Sara Fernandes-Taylor, Alexander V Fisher, Suresh Agarwal, Amy J Kind, Caprice C Greenberg, Pascale Carayon and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American College of Surgeons, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Alexandra W AcherWisconsin Surgical Outcomes Research Program, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI; Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI.
Stephanie A Campbell-FlohrWisconsin Surgical Outcomes Research Program, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI; Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI.
Maria Brenny-FitzpatrickWisconsin Surgical Outcomes Research Program, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI; Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI.
Kristine M Leahy-GrossWisconsin Surgical Outcomes Research Program, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI; Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI.
Sara Fernandes-TaylorWisconsin Surgical Outcomes Research Program, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI; Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI.
Alexander V FisherWisconsin Surgical Outcomes Research Program, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI; Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI.
Suresh AgarwalWisconsin Surgical Outcomes Research Program, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI; Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI.
Amy J KindDepartment of Medicine, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI; William S Middleton Memorial Veterans Hospital, Shorewood Hills, WI.
Caprice C GreenbergWisconsin Surgical Outcomes Research Program, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI; Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI; Center for Quality and Productivity Improvement, College of Engineering, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI; Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI.
Pascale CarayonCenter for Quality and Productivity Improvement, College of Engineering, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI; Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI.
Sharon M WeberWisconsin Surgical Outcomes Research Program, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI; Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI; William S Middleton Memorial Veterans Hospital, Shorewood Hills, WI. Electronic address: webers@surgery.wisc.edu.

Funding

Incorporating the Patient Perspective to Reduce Readmission after Complex SurgeryK18HS022446 · AHRQ · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI WEBER, SHARON M · 2014 to 2015
$370k
AHRQ HHS K18 HS022446
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPoor-quality transitions of care from hospital to home contribute to high rates of readmission after complex abdominal surgery. The Coordinated Transitional Care (C-TraC) program improved readmission rates in medical patients, but evidence-based surgical transitional care protocols are lacking. This pilot study evaluated the feasibility and preliminary effectiveness of an adapted surgical C-TraC protocol. STUDY

designThe intervention includes in-person enrollment of patients. Follow-up protocolized phone calls by specially trained surgical C-TraC nurses addressed medication management, clinic appointments, operation-specific concerns, and identification of red-flag symptoms. Enrollment criteria included pancreatectomy, gastrectomy, operative small bowel obstruction or perforation, ostomy, discharge with a drain, in-hospital complication, and clinician discretion. Engaged patients participated in the first phone call, which was within 48 to 72 hours of discharge and continued every 3 to 4 days. Patients completed the program once they and surgical C-TraC nurse agreed that no additional follow-up was needed or the patient was readmitted.

resultsTwo hundred and twelve patients were enrolled, October 2015 through April 2016, with a mean age of 56 years (range 19 to 89 years); 33% of patients were 65 years or older. Surgery sites included colon (46%), small bowel (16%), pancreas (12%), multivisceral (9%), liver (4.5%), retroperitoneum/soft tissue (4.5%), gastric (4%), biliary (2%), and appendix (1.5%). Refusal rate was 1% and engagement was 95%. At initial call, 47% of patients had at least 1 medication discrepancy (range 0 to 6). Mean number of calls from provider to patient was 3.2 (range 0 to 20, median 3).

conclusionsA phone-based transitional care protocol for surgical patients is feasible, with <1% refusals and 95% engagement. Medication management is a prominent issue. Future studies are needed to assess the impact of surgical C-TraC on post-discharge healthcare use.

Indexed as

Quality ImprovementAbdomenAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient-Centered CarePilot ProjectsTransitional CareYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID28549765
PMCPMC5606230

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.