ArticleBioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters2017
Optimization of the process of inverted peptides (PIPE
Article in Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- PPARStem cells international · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
PDZ domains play crucial roles in cell signaling processes and are therefore attractive targets for the development of therapeutic inhibitors. In many cases, C-terminal peptides are the physiological binding partners of PDZ domains. To identify both native ligands and potential inhibitors we have screened arrays synthesized by the process of inverted peptides (PIPE), a variant of SPOT synthesis that generates peptides with free C-termini. Here, we present the development of a new functionalized cellulose membrane as solid support along with the optimized PIPE
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.