ArticleAtherosclerosis2017
Greater preclinical atherosclerosis in treated monogenic familial hypercholesterolemia vs. polygenic hypercholesterolemia.
Article in Atherosclerosis, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
37 citing papers in PubMed.
- Genetic Determinants of the Familial Hypercholesterolaemia Phenotype.Annals of human genetics · 2025Review
- Clinical and biochemical features of atherogenic hyperlipidemias with different genetic basis: A comprehensive comparative study.PloS one · 2024Article
- Aortic Wall Thickness as a Surrogate for Subclinical Atherosclerosis in Familial and Nonfamilial Hypercholesterolemia: Quantitative 3D Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study and Interrelations with Computed Tomography Calcium Scores, and Carotid Ultrasonography.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
- Familial Hypercholesterolemia: Pitfalls and Challenges in Diagnosis and Treatment.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2023Review
- Genetic and molecular architecture of familial hypercholesterolemia.Journal of internal medicine · 2023Review
- Subclinical atherosclerosis determined by coronary artery calcium deposition in patients with clinical familial hypercholesterolemia.Atherosclerosis plus · 2022Article
- The Clinical Importance of Differentiating Monogenic Familial Hypercholesterolemia from Polygenic Hypercholesterolemia.Current cardiology reports · 2022Review
- Updates on the Use of Subclinical Atherosclerosis to Predict Risk of Cardiovascular Events in Heterozygous Familial Hypercholesterolemia.Current atherosclerosis reports · 2022Review
- Review
- Twelve Variants Polygenic Score for Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Distribution in a Large Cohort of Patients With Clinically Diagnosed Familial Hypercholesterolemia With or Without Causative Mutations.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2022Article
- The Role of Cumulative LDL Cholesterol in Cardiovascular Disease Development in Patients with Familial Hypercholesterolemia.Journal of personalized medicine · 2022Article
- Risk Assessment and Clinical Management of Children and Adolescents with Heterozygous Familial Hypercholesterolaemia. A Position Paper of the Associations of Preventive Pediatrics of Serbia, Mighty Medic and International Lipid Expert Panel.Journal of clinical medicine · 2021Review
- Large-Scale Screening for Monogenic and Clinically Defined Familial Hypercholesterolemia in Iceland.Arteriosclerosis, thrombosis, and vascular biology · 2021Article
- Article
- Montreal-FH-SCORE Predicts Coronary Artery Calcium Score in Patients With Familial Hypercholesterolemia.CJC open · 2021Article
- Genetic testing for familial hypercholesterolemia-past, present, and future.Journal of lipid research · 2021Review
- Effect of NPC1L1 and HMGCR Genetic Variants With Premature Triple-Vessel Coronary Disease.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2021Article
- High-Sensitivity C-Reactive Protein and Carotid Intima Media Thickness as Markers of Subclinical Inflammation and Atherosclerosis in Pediatric Patients with Hypercholesterolemia.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Review
- A polygenic biomarker to identify patients with severe hypercholesterolemia of polygenic origin.Molecular genetics & genomic medicine · 2020Article
- Familial hypercholesterolaemia: evolving knowledge for designing adaptive models of care.Nature reviews. Cardiology · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
aimsFamilial hypercholesterolemia (FH) is a common inherited disorder of low density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-C) metabolism. It is associated with higher risk of premature coronary heart disease. Around 60% of patients with a clinical diagnosis of FH do not have a detectable mutation in the genes causing FH and are most likely to have a polygenic cause for their raised LDL-C. We assessed the degree of preclinical atherosclerosis in treated patients with monogenic FH versus polygenic hypercholesterolemia.
methodsFH mutation testing and genotypes of six LDL-C-associated single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) were determined using routine methods. Those with a detected mutation (monogenic) and mutation-negative patients with LDL-C SNP score in the top two quartiles (polygenic) were recruited. Carotid intima media thickness (IMT) was measured by B-mode ultrasound and the coronary artery calcium (CAC) score was performed in three lipid clinics in the UK and the Netherlands.
results86 patients (56 monogenic FH, 30 polygenic) with carotid IMT measurement, and 166 patients (124 monogenic, 42 polygenic) with CAC score measurement were examined. After adjustment for age and gender, the mean of all the carotid IMT measurements and CAC scores were significantly greater in the monogenic than the polygenic patients [carotid IMT mean (95% CI): 0.74 mm (0.7-0.79) vs. 0.66 mm (0.61-0.72), p = 0.038 and CAC score mean (95%): 24.5 (14.4-41.8) vs. 2.65 (0.94-7.44), p = 0.0004].
conclusionsIn patients with a diagnosis of FH, those with a monogenic cause have a higher severity of carotid and coronary preclinical atherosclerosis than those with a polygenic aetiology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.