ArticleDrug delivery2017
Reversed lipid-based nanoparticles dispersed in oil for malignant tumor treatment via intratumoral injection.
Article in Drug delivery, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Lipid-Based Nanoparticles in Cancer Therapy: Advances in Targeted Drug Delivery and Therapeutic Potential for Renal Cell Carcinoma.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025Review
- Development of Intratumoral Drug Delivery Based Strategies for Antitumor Therapy.Drug design, development and therapy · 2024Review
- Article
- "Oil-soluble" reversed lipid nanoparticles for oral insulin delivery.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2020Article
- A Light-Triggered Mesenchymal Stem Cell Delivery System for Photoacoustic Imaging and Chemo-Photothermal Therapy of Triple Negative Breast Cancer.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2018Article
- Lipopolysaccharide-coated CuS nanoparticles promoted anti-cancer and anti-metastatic effect by immuno-photothermal therapy.Oncotarget · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Intratumoral injection of anticancer drugs directly delivers chemotherapeutics to the tumor region, offering an alternative strategy for cancer treatment. However, most hydrophilic drugs spread quickly from the injection site into systemic circulation, leading to inferior antitumor activity and adverse effects in patients. Therefore, we developed novel reversed lipid-based nanoparticles (RLBN) as a nanoscale drug carrier. RLBNs differ from traditional nanoscale drug carriers in that they possess a reversed structure consisting of a polar core and lipophilic periphery, leading to excellent solubility and stability in hydrophobic liquids; therefore, hydrophilic drugs can be entrapped in RLBNs and dispersed in oil. In vivo studies in tumor-bearing Balb/c nude mice indicated remarkable antitumor activity of RLBN-DOX after a single injection, with effective tumor growth inhibition for at least 17 days; the inhibition rate was ∼80%. These results can be attributed to the long-term retention and sustained drug release of RLBN-DOX in the tumor region. In contrast, intratumoral injection of free DOX showed weaker antitumor activity than RLBN-DOX did, with the tumor size doubling by day 11 and tripling by day 17. Further, the initial burst of drug released from free DOX could produce detrimental systemic effects, such as weight loss. Histological analyses by TUNEL staining showed apoptosis after treatment with RLBN-DOX, whereas tumor cell viability was high in the free DOX group. Current results indicate that RLBNs show sustained delivery of hydrophilic agents to local areas resulting in therapeutic efficacy, and they may be a promising drug delivery system suitable for intratumoral chemotherapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.