Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28549194›Full record

ArticleMolecular biology and evolution2017

Disentangling Timing of Admixture, Patterns of Introgression, and Phenotypic Indicators in a Hybridizing Wolf Population.

Marco Galaverni, Romolo Caniglia, Luca Pagani, Elena Fabbri, Alessio Boattini, Ettore Randi

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular biology and evolution, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed
6.4field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 91 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Simulating the efficacy of wolf-dog hybridization management with individual-based modeling.Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Phylogenetic History and Phylogeographic Patterns of the European Wildcat (Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023
    Article
  15. Article
  16. "Guess Who's Coming to Dinner": Molecular Tools to ReconstructAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Marco GalaverniArea per la Genetica della Conservazione, ISPRA, Ozzano dell'Emilia Bologna, Italy.
Romolo CanigliaArea per la Genetica della Conservazione, ISPRA, Ozzano dell'Emilia Bologna, Italy.
Luca PaganiDipartimento di Biologia, Universita degli Studi di Padova, Padua, Italy.
Elena FabbriArea per la Genetica della Conservazione, ISPRA, Ozzano dell'Emilia Bologna, Italy.
Alessio BoattiniDepartment of Biological, Geological and Environmental Sciences, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Ettore RandiArea per la Genetica della Conservazione, ISPRA, Ozzano dell'Emilia Bologna, Italy.
Istituto Superiore per la Protezione e la Ricerca Ambientale · ITAalborg University · DKEstonian Biocentre · EEUniversity of Bologna · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hybridization is a natural or anthropogenic process that can deeply affect the genetic make-up of populations, possibly decreasing individual fitness but sometimes favoring local adaptations. The population of Italian wolves (Canis lupus), after protracted demographic declines and isolation, is currently expanding in anthropic areas, with documented cases of hybridization with stray domestic dogs. However, identifying admixture patterns in deeply introgressed populations is far from trivial. In this study, we used a panel of 170,000 SNPs analyzed with multivariate, Bayesian and local ancestry reconstruction methods to identify hybrids, estimate their ancestry proportions and timing since admixture. Moreover, we carried out preliminary genotype-phenotype association analyses to identify the genetic bases of three phenotypic traits (black coat, white claws, and spur on the hind legs) putative indicators of hybridization. Results showed no sharp subdivisions between nonadmixed wolves and hybrids, indicating that recurrent hybridization and deep introgression might have started mostly at the beginning of the population reexpansion. In hybrids, we identified a number of genomic regions with excess of ancestry in one of the parental populations, and regions with excess or resistance to introgression compared with neutral expectations. The three morphological traits showed significant genotype-phenotype associations, with a single genomic region for black coats and white claws, and with multiple genomic regions for the spur. In all cases the associated haplotypes were likely derived from dogs. In conclusion, we show that the use of multiple genome-wide ancestry reconstructions allows clarifying the admixture dynamics even in highly introgressed populations, and supports their conservation management.

Indexed as

AnimalsBayes TheoremDemographyDogsGenetic Association StudiesGenetics, PopulationGenetic VariationGenomeGenomicsHaplotypesHybridization, GeneticItalyMicrosatellite RepeatsPolymorphism, Single NucleotideSequence Analysis, DNAWolvesadmixture historyCanis lupusgenotype–phenotype associationhybridizationintrogression

Identifiers

PMID28549194
PMCPMC5850710
OpenAlexW2618543925

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.