Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28548701›Full record

ArticleJournal of cellular physiology2018

Microtubules regulate brush border formation.

Facundo M Tonucci, Anabela Ferretti, Evangelina Almada, Pamela Cribb, Rodrigo Vena, Florencia Hidalgo, Cristián Favre, Matt J Tyska, Irina Kaverina, Maria C Larocca

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cellular physiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 38% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Facundo M TonucciInstituto de Fisiología Experimental, Consejo de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas, Facultad de Ciencias Bioquímicas y Farmacéuticas, Universidad Nacional de Rosario, Rosario, Argentina.
Anabela FerrettiInstituto de Fisiología Experimental, Consejo de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas, Facultad de Ciencias Bioquímicas y Farmacéuticas, Universidad Nacional de Rosario, Rosario, Argentina.
Evangelina AlmadaInstituto de Fisiología Experimental, Consejo de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas, Facultad de Ciencias Bioquímicas y Farmacéuticas, Universidad Nacional de Rosario, Rosario, Argentina.
Pamela CribbInstituto de Biología Molecular y Celular de Rosario, Consejo de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas, Facultad de Ciencias Bioquímicas y Farmacéuticas, Universidad Nacional de Rosario, Rosario, Argentina.
Rodrigo VenaInstituto de Biología Molecular y Celular de Rosario, Consejo de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas, Facultad de Ciencias Bioquímicas y Farmacéuticas, Universidad Nacional de Rosario, Rosario, Argentina.
Florencia HidalgoInstituto de Fisiología Experimental, Consejo de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas, Facultad de Ciencias Bioquímicas y Farmacéuticas, Universidad Nacional de Rosario, Rosario, Argentina.
Cristián FavreInstituto de Fisiología Experimental, Consejo de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas, Facultad de Ciencias Bioquímicas y Farmacéuticas, Universidad Nacional de Rosario, Rosario, Argentina.
Matt J TyskaDepartment of Cell and Developmental Biology, Epithelial Biology Center, Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center and the Nashville VA Medical Center, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee.
Irina KaverinaDepartment of Cell and Developmental Biology, Epithelial Biology Center, Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center and the Nashville VA Medical Center, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee.
Maria C LaroccaInstituto de Fisiología Experimental, Consejo de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas, Facultad de Ciencias Bioquímicas y Farmacéuticas, Universidad Nacional de Rosario, Rosario, Argentina.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6967-5431
National University of Rosario · ARVanderbilt University · US

Funding

Translational Analysis CoreP30DK058404 · NIDDK · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI RICHARD M. PEEK · 2002 to 2026
$29.9M
Microtubule Regulation of Pancreatic Beta Cell Function and DiabetesR01DK106228 · NIDDK · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI Guoqiang Gu, William Holmes · 2016 to 2026
$6.4M
Molecular basis of brush border assemblyR01DK095811 · NIDDK · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI MATTHEW J TYSKA · 2013 to 2026
$4.9M
Role of I-BAR proteins in enterocyte differentiationR01DK111949 · NIDDK · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI MATTHEW J TYSKA · 2017 to 2026
$4.2M
Spatial Regulation of Cytoskeletal AsymmetryR01GM078373 · NIGMS · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI KAVERINA, IRINA · 2008 to 2017
$3.2M
Regulation of Brush Border Structure by Myosin-1aR01DK075555 · NIDDK · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI TYSKA, MATTHEW J · 2007 to 2016
$2.7M
FORECASTING EMERGING ZOONOTIC DISEASE TRANSMISSIONH75IP000287 · IP · UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS LAWRENCE · PI KRISHTALKA, LEONARD · 2008 to 2008
$1.1M
NCIRD CDC HHS H75 IP000287NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK058404NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK075555NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK095811NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK106228NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK111949NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM078373
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Most epithelial cells contain apical membrane structures associated to bundles of actin filaments, which constitute the brush border. Whereas microtubule participation in the maintenance of the brush border identity has been characterized, their contribution to de novo microvilli organization remained elusive. Hereby, using a cell model of individual enterocyte polarization, we found that nocodazole induced microtubule depolymerization prevented the de novo brush border formation. Microtubule participation in brush border actin organization was confirmed in polarized kidney tubule MDCK cells. We also found that centrosome, but not Golgi derived microtubules, were essential for the initial stages of brush border development. During this process, microtubule plus ends acquired an early asymmetric orientation toward the apical membrane, which clearly differs from their predominant basal orientation in mature epithelia. In addition, overexpression of the microtubule plus ends associated protein CLIP170, which regulate actin nucleation in different cell contexts, facilitated brush border formation. In combination, the present results support the participation of centrosomal microtubule plus ends in the activation of the polarized actin organization associated to brush border formation, unveiling a novel mechanism of microtubule regulation of epithelial polarity.

Indexed as

Actin CytoskeletonAnimalsCell PolarityCentromereColonDogsEnterocytesEpithelial CellsHumansKidneyMadin Darby Canine Kidney CellsMicrotubule-Associated ProteinsMicrotubulesMicrovilliNocodazoleTime FactorsMicrotubule-Associated ProteinsNocodazoleTubulin Modulatorsactinbrush borderepithelial polaritymicrotubulesMTOC

Identifiers

PMID28548701
PMCPMC5673559
OpenAlexW2617845507

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.