Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28548345›Full record

ReviewMolecular oncology2017

EMT and MET: necessary or permissive for metastasis?

Mohit Kumar Jolly, Kathryn E Ware, Shivee Gilja, Jason A Somarelli, Herbert Levine

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Molecular oncology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 232 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
232citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

232 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Changes in Tissue Fluidity Predict Tumor Aggressiveness In Vivo.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Anticancer Effects of Sacha Inchi (International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Anti-Metastatic Effects ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

172 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Mohit Kumar JollyCenter for Theoretical Biological Physics, Rice University, Houston, TX, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6631-2109
Kathryn E WareDuke Cancer Institute & Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.
Shivee GiljaDuke Cancer Institute & Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.
Jason A SomarelliDuke Cancer Institute & Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.
Herbert LevineCenter for Theoretical Biological Physics, Rice University, Houston, TX, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT) and its reverse mesenchymal-to-epithelial transition (MET) have been suggested to play crucial roles in metastatic dissemination of carcinomas. These phenotypic transitions between states are not binary. Instead, carcinoma cells often exhibit a spectrum of epithelial/mesenchymal phenotype(s). While epithelial/mesenchymal plasticity has been observed preclinically and clinically, whether any of these phenotypic transitions are indispensable for metastatic outgrowth remains an unanswered question. Here, we focus on epithelial/mesenchymal plasticity in metastatic dissemination and propose alternative mechanisms for successful dissemination and metastases beyond the traditional EMT/MET view. We highlight multiple hypotheses that can help reconcile conflicting observations, and outline the next set of key questions that can offer valuable insights into mechanisms of metastasis in multiple tumor models.

Indexed as

Epithelial-Mesenchymal TransitionAnimalsHumansNeoplasm MetastasisNeoplasmsepithelial-to-mesenchymal transitionhybrid epithelial/mesenchymalmesenchymal-to-epithelial transitionmetastasisphenotypic plasticity

Identifiers

PMID28548345
PMCPMC5496498

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.