Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28548310›Full record

Observational studyJournal of clinical laboratory analysis2018

Diagnostic and prognostic values of Club cell protein 16 (CC16) in critical care patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome.

Jinle Lin, Wenwu Zhang, Lijun Wang, Fang Tian

Open access · hybridAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Journal of clinical laboratory analysis, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Transfusion-Related Acute Lung Injury: from Mechanistic Insights to Therapeutic Strategies.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Observational
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Club cell protein (CC)16 as potential lung injury marker in a porcine 72 h polytrauma model.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2022
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jinle LinDepartment of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Baoan Hospital, Nanfang Medical University, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China.
Wenwu ZhangDepartment of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Baoan Hospital, Nanfang Medical University, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2660-8714
Lijun WangDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Baoan Hospital, Nanfang Medical University, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China.
Fang TianDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Baoan Hospital, Nanfang Medical University, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China.
Nanfang Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAcute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is a critical condition characterized by bilateral pulmonary infiltrates and severe hypoxemia. This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic and prognostic values of Club cell protein 16 (CC16) in critical care patients with ARDS.

methodsIn this retrospective observational study, 83 patients with ARDS and 129 non-ARDS patients on ICU admission were enrolled. The differences in serum CC16 and other laboratory indicators between two groups were analyzed. The sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and accuracy of CC16 as a diagnostic marker on ICU admission were determined by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. The correlation between serum CC16 levels and the severity of ARDS as quantified by PaO

resultsThe serum CC16 levels in ARDS patients were significantly higher than that in non-ARDS patients (54.44±19.62 vs 24.13±12.32 ng/mL, P=.001). ROC analysis showed that the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were 90.4%, 79.8%, 74.2%, and 92.8%, respectively, when the cut-off value was set at 33.3 ng/mL. CC16 levels were correlated with the severity of ARDS. The serum CC16 levels were significantly greater in non-survivors than in survivors from the ARDS group. CC16 levels were associated with ICU stay but not hospital stay.

conclusionsCC16 may serve as a diagnostic and stratification marker for ARDS. However, it provided limited prognostic information for ARDS.

Indexed as

Respiratory Distress SyndromeAdultAgedCritical CareFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisRetrospective StudiesROC CurveUteroglobinSCGB1A1 protein, humanUteroglobinacute respiratory distress syndromeBerlin definitionbiomarkersClub cell protein 16

Identifiers

PMID28548310
PMCPMC5836869
OpenAlexW2617671230

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.