Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28547533›Full record

Observational studyInternational ophthalmology2018

Sensitivity and specificity of optical coherence tomography angiography (OCT-A) for detection of choroidal neovascularization in real-life practice and varying retinal expertise level.

Vaël Souedan, Eric H Souied, Violaine Caillaux, Alexandra Miere, Ala El Ameen, Rocio Blanco-Garavito

Abstract readObservational Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in International ophthalmology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Vascular remodeling of macular neovascularization following switch to intravitreal faricimab in neovascular AMD.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Assessing the Sensitivity of OCT-A Retinal Vasculature Metrics.Translational vision science & technology · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Vaël SouedanDepartment of Ophthalmology, Créteil University Eye Clinic, Hôpital Intercommunal de Créteil, University Paris Est, 40 Avenue de Verdun, 94010, Créteil, France.
Eric H SouiedDepartment of Ophthalmology, Créteil University Eye Clinic, Hôpital Intercommunal de Créteil, University Paris Est, 40 Avenue de Verdun, 94010, Créteil, France.
Violaine CaillauxDepartment of Ophthalmology, Créteil University Eye Clinic, Hôpital Intercommunal de Créteil, University Paris Est, 40 Avenue de Verdun, 94010, Créteil, France.
Alexandra MiereDepartment of Ophthalmology, Créteil University Eye Clinic, Hôpital Intercommunal de Créteil, University Paris Est, 40 Avenue de Verdun, 94010, Créteil, France.
Ala El AmeenDepartment of Ophthalmology, Créteil University Eye Clinic, Hôpital Intercommunal de Créteil, University Paris Est, 40 Avenue de Verdun, 94010, Créteil, France.
Rocio Blanco-GaravitoDepartment of Ophthalmology, Créteil University Eye Clinic, Hôpital Intercommunal de Créteil, University Paris Est, 40 Avenue de Verdun, 94010, Créteil, France. rocio_blancog@hotmail.com.
Hôpital Intercommunal de Créteil · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of OCT angiography (OCT-A) detecting or predicting choroidal neovascularization (CNV), by ophthalmologists of disparate degrees of skills in retinal diseases, using spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) and fluorescein angiography (FA) as a standard reference.

methodsRetrospective observational case series. Patient presenting maculopathy and complete imaging were included. FA, SD-OCT, OCT-A and FA coupled to SD-OCT images were graded independently for presence or absence of CNV by ophthalmologists with varying expertise levels.

resultsOverall sensitivity of OCT-A was 85.62% (95% CI 79.04-90.76%) and specificity was 81.51% (95% CI 73.36-88.03). Sensitivity of FA was 74.51% (95% CI 66.84-81.20), and specificity was 82.35% (95% CI 74.30-88.73). Sensitivity of FA + SD-OCT was 92.72% (95% CI 87.34-96.30), and specificity was 90.91% (95% CI 84.31-95.37).

conclusionOCT-A has good sensitivity and specificity for the detection of CNV in all expertise level groups. OCT-A may soon become a routine tool for CNV diagnosis and follow-up.

Indexed as

Clinical CompetenceAgedChoroidal NeovascularizationClinical CodingFemaleFluorescein AngiographyFundus OculiHumansMaleMiddle AgedOphthalmologistsRetrospective StudiesSensitivity and SpecificityTomography, Optical CoherenceVisual AcuityChoroidal neovascularization detectionExudative AMDOptical coherence tomography angiographySensitivitySpecificity

Identifiers

PMID28547533
OpenAlexW2619140520

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.