Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28547158›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology2017

Impact of prompt intervention in response to positive blood culture results during weekends by collaboration between infectious disease specialists and microbiology laboratory staff.

M Tsuboi, K Hayakawa, K Mezaki, Y Katanami, K Yamamoto, S Kutsuna, N Takeshita, N Ohmagari

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

M TsuboiDisease Control and Prevention Center, National Center for Global Health and Medicine, 1-21-1, Toyama, Shinjuku, Tokyo, 162-8655, Japan. mtsuboi@hosp.ncgm.go.jp.
K HayakawaDisease Control and Prevention Center, National Center for Global Health and Medicine, 1-21-1, Toyama, Shinjuku, Tokyo, 162-8655, Japan. kayokohayakawa@gmail.com.
K MezakiMicrobiology Laboratory, National Center for Global Health and Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Y KatanamiDisease Control and Prevention Center, National Center for Global Health and Medicine, 1-21-1, Toyama, Shinjuku, Tokyo, 162-8655, Japan.
K YamamotoDisease Control and Prevention Center, National Center for Global Health and Medicine, 1-21-1, Toyama, Shinjuku, Tokyo, 162-8655, Japan.
S KutsunaDisease Control and Prevention Center, National Center for Global Health and Medicine, 1-21-1, Toyama, Shinjuku, Tokyo, 162-8655, Japan.
N TakeshitaDisease Control and Prevention Center, National Center for Global Health and Medicine, 1-21-1, Toyama, Shinjuku, Tokyo, 162-8655, Japan.
N OhmagariDisease Control and Prevention Center, National Center for Global Health and Medicine, 1-21-1, Toyama, Shinjuku, Tokyo, 162-8655, Japan.

Funding

Grants for International Health Research from the Ministry of Health Labor and Welfare of Japan 26S-120Grants-in Aid for Research from the National Center for Global Health and Medicine 26A201
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The purpose of this investigation was to elucidate the impact of prompt intervention for patients whose blood culture results became positive during weekends, as this is not standard care in some countries. A retrospective cohort study was conducted in a tertiary referral hospital. From June 2015, results of positive blood cultures became available during weekends. If infectious disease specialists identified cases of bacteremia on suboptimal antimicrobial coverage, they contacted the primary team for modification of antibiotic treatment. We reviewed patients whose blood culture results became positive during weekends, comparing the pre-intervention (September 2014 to May 2015) and post-intervention (June 2015 to February 2016) periods. In total, 1081 (post-intervention 568 [52.5%]) bacteremia episodes were included (median patient age [interquartile range, IQR]: 72 [60-82] years; men: 625 [57.8%]). During the post-intervention period, 187 (32.9%) bacteremia episodes were detected during weekends. Infectious disease specialists evaluated the positive blood culture results 1, 2, and ≥3 days prior in 77 (13.6%), 88 (15.5%), and 22 (3.9%) cases, respectively. Although the 7- and 30-day mortality did not significantly improve after the intervention, the length of hospital stay (LOS) in the hospital-acquired bacteremia group was significantly reduced during the post-intervention period after controlling for confounders (post- vs. pre-intervention: median days [IQR]: 37 [19-63] vs. 46.5 [24.8-86.3], p = 0.030). Blood culture results became positive during weekends in one-third of bacteremia cases. The LOS was shortened after the intervention in the hospital-acquired bacteremia group. This could be an important antimicrobial stewardship target.

Indexed as

Disease ManagementLaboratory PersonnelSpecializationAgedAged, 80 and overAnti-Bacterial AgentsBacteremiaBloodFemaleHumansLength of StayMaleMicrobial Sensitivity TestsMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesSurvival AnalysisAnti-Bacterial Agents

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.