Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28547136›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of legal medicine2018

Curiosities of X chromosomal markers and haplotypes.

Daniel Kling

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of legal medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Daniel KlingDepartment of Forensic Services, Oslo University Hospital, P.O. Box 4950, Nydalen, 0424, Oslo, Norway. daniel.l.kling@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent progress in forensic genetics has introduced a number of closely located short tandem repeat (STR) markers on the X chromosome. Inevitably, dependencies arise that have to be accounted for. This paper will in detail explore the complex statistical interpretation of X-chromosomal STR markers, focusing on likelihood calculations. Specifically, we will investigate how the phase uncertainty of haplotypes comes into play in the statistical evaluations and what curious effects this phenomenon can have. The starting point is the different real cases where the weight of evidence has provided unexpected results that require further investigation in order to be fully understood. We will touch upon subjects such as association between alleles, recombinations, and mutations. The aim of this study is to facilitate a better understanding of the interaction between the concepts in addition to provide an understanding why good estimates of haplotype frequencies are crucial. The individual subjects have been discussed in other fields, whereas this study will focus on forensic applications where few studies have been conducted relating to the understanding of how these concepts interact.

Indexed as

Chromosomes, Human, XDNA FingerprintingHaplotypesMicrosatellite RepeatsFemaleForensic GeneticsHumansLikelihood FunctionsMaleModels, StatisticalMutationPedigreePolymorphism, Single NucleotideArgus X12HaplotypesLDMutationsX STR

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.