Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28546926›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of ophthalmology2017

Iontophoresis-assisted corneal crosslinking using 0.1% riboflavin for progressive keratoconus.

Hong-Zhen Jia, Xu Pang, Zheng-Jun Fan, Na Li, Gang Li, Xiu-Jun Peng

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of ophthalmology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Transepithelial corneal cross-linking: a review.International ophthalmology · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Keratoconus.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2024
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Current concepts in crosslinking thin corneas.Indian journal of ophthalmology · 2019
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Hong-Zhen JiaChinese PLA Medical School, Beijing 100853, China.
Xu PangDepartment of Ophthalmology, Chinese PLA Navy General Hospital, Beijing 100048, China.
Zheng-Jun FanDepartment of Ophthalmology, Chinese PLA Navy General Hospital, Beijing 100048, China.
Na LiDepartment of Ophthalmology, Chinese PLA Navy General Hospital, Beijing 100048, China.
Gang LiDepartment of Ophthalmology, Chinese PLA Navy General Hospital, Beijing 100048, China.
Xiu-Jun PengChinese PLA Medical School, Beijing 100853, China.
PLA Navy General Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo report the clinical results of iontophoresis-assisted epithelium-on corneal crosslinking (I-CXL) using 0.1% riboflavin in distilled water for progressive keratoconus.

methodsIn this prospective clinical study, we examined 94 eyes of 75 patients with progressive keratoconus who were treated with I-CXL using 0.1% riboflavin in distilled water. Best correct visual acuity (BCVA), Scheimpflug tomography, corneal topography, anterior segment optical coherence tomography, intraocular pressure, and endothelial cell density were evaluated at baseline and 1, 3, 6, 12, and 24mo after I-CXL.

resultsAfter 24mo I-CXL, compared to the level at baseline, BCVA significantly improved 0.14±0.07 (

conclusionI-CXL using 0.1% riboflavin halts keratoconus progression within 24mo, resulting in a significant improvement in visual and topographic parameters. Moreover, the depth of the demarcation line is similar to that previously reported in standard epithelium-off CXL procedures.

Indexed as

corneal cross-linkingdistilled wateriontophoresiskeratoconusriboflavin

Identifiers

PMID28546926
PMCPMC5437457
OpenAlexW2624144950

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.