Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28546850›Full record

ArticleThe World Allergy Organization journal2017

Knowledge and management of chronic spontaneous urticaria in Latin America: a cross-sectional study in Ecuador.

A Cherrez, M Maurer, K Weller, J C Calderon, D Simancas-Racines, I Cherrez Ojeda

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The World Allergy Organization journal, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. A Patient Charter for Chronic Urticaria.Advances in therapy · 2024
    Article
  7. Urticaria.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2022
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Etiology of chronic urticaria: the Ecuadorian experience.The World Allergy Organization journal · 2018
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Management of chronic spontaneous urticaria: a worldwide perspective.The World Allergy Organization journal · 2018
    Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

A CherrezRespiralab Research Group, Respiralab, Guayaquil, Ecuador.
M MaurerDepartment of Dermatology and Allergy, Allergie-Centrum-Charité, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
K WellerDepartment of Dermatology and Allergy, Allergie-Centrum-Charité, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
J C CalderonRespiralab Research Group, Respiralab, Guayaquil, Ecuador.
D Simancas-RacinesCentro de Investigación en Salud Pública y Epidemiologia Clínica, Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud Eugenio Espejo, Universidad Tecnológica Equinoccial, Quito, Ecuador.
I Cherrez OjedaRespiralab Research Group, Respiralab, Guayaquil, Ecuador.
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DEUniversidad de Especialidades Espíritu Santo · ECHeidelberg University · DEUniversidad UTE · EC

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe current EAACI/GA

methodsWe investigated physicians who treat CsU patients in a cross-sectional study using a standardized questionnaire. Descriptive statistics were employed, adjusted logistic regression was performed to assess the link of guideline knowledge and use of therapy.

resultsSeven hundred forty surveys were collected and analyzed. The mean age of physicians was 42.3 (±12.5) years. Most of the participants (65.1%) were general physicians (GP), 13.7% were pediatricians, 11.0% internists, 6.8% dermatologists or allergists (D/A). Only 18.8% knew the EAACI/GA

conclusionThis study shows that the knowledge of guideline recommendations in physicians who treat urticaria patients in Ecuador is low. The diagnostic workup and treatment of CsU patients are largely not in line with guideline recommendations in real life practice settings. We were able to compare results between German and Ecuadorian physicians and found that Ecuadorian physicians have lower awareness of the current guideline (33 vs 18%). Only one-third of physicians reported using regular doses of sgAHs as the first line treatment. Also, only 12.9% of physicians use sgAHs in higher doses and physicians still use fgAHs, particularly pediatricians (42.9%). Our results suggest that disparities in knowledge between physicians from different countries could influence the management of CsU. Knowledge of the guidelines is linked to better choices of treatments. Awareness of guidelines needs to be promoted for better management of chronic urticaria.

Indexed as

Chronic urticariaGuidelinesLatin AmericaManagementTreatment

Identifiers

PMID28546850
PMCPMC5440895
OpenAlexW2611816474

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.