ArticleIndian journal of surgical oncology2017
Histological Surprises in Benign Cytologies after Lymph Node Biopsy-Surgeon's Knife Improving Patient Care.
Article in Indian journal of surgical oncology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- A Difficult Case of Pyrexia of Unknown Origin.Indian journal of pediatrics · 2021Article
- Efficacy evaluation of acupotomy combined with platelet-rich plasma in the treatment of early and middle osteoarthritis.American journal of clinical and experimental immunology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Lymphadenopathy can be due to multitude of causes. Owing to the high prevalence of infectious diseases in India, and malignancy being a life threatening cause for lymphadenopathy; accurate diagnosis is important in preventing delay or misdiagnosis and in improving patient care, thereby increasing longevity with quality. Fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) is the first line investigation commonly done. Should the doctor be contented with the benign FNAC or is a lymph node biopsy needed in this age? The aims of this study are the following: (1) to study the spectral pattern of lymph node biopsies done in a surgical oncology unit of tertiary care centre, (2) to assess the yield of malignant cases from lymph node biopsy and (3) to compare the reliability of benign FNAC with lymph node biopsy. Cross-sectional study of 114 cases that underwent lymph node biopsy during the year 2014, at the Surgical Oncology Department of St. John's Medical College Hospital, Bangalore. Lymph node biopsies were done in the outpatient department (OPD) under local anaesthesia or in the operation theatre under local anaesthesia/monitored anaesthesia care based on the clinical condition of the patient. Regional lymph node dissections, central node biopsy, patients with known case of malignancy were excluded. Specimen sent for histopathological study and immunohistochemistry (IHC) done when needed. 58.8% were males among study population, age ranging from 15 to 80 years, 57% cervical and 29.8% axillary lymph node biopsies done. Sixty-seven percent (67%) of biopsies done in OPD. Thirty-three percent (33%) of biopsies in the operation theatre among which 60.5% under local anaesthesia only. 35.1% cases were reactive hyperplasia, 24.6% lymphomas with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma being the commonest, 13.2% metastatic disease with adenocarcinoma being the commonest. 72.7% of the supraclavicular nodes were malignant. 47.4% of subjects had prior FNAC of the lymph node. Twenty-five percent (25%) of the reactive hyperplasia's on FNAC (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.