Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28546660›Full record

ReviewJournal of obstetrics and gynaecology of India2017

Can We Deliver Better?

Ajay Rane, Jay Iyer, Harsha Ananthram, Thomas Currie

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology of India, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 44% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ajay RaneDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, James Cook University, 100 Angus Smith Dr., Douglas, QLD 4814 Australia.
Jay IyerDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, James Cook University, 100 Angus Smith Dr., Douglas, QLD 4814 Australia.
Harsha AnanthramDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, James Cook University, 100 Angus Smith Dr., Douglas, QLD 4814 Australia.
Thomas CurrieDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, James Cook University, 100 Angus Smith Dr., Douglas, QLD 4814 Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-4469-7351
Townsville Hospital · AUJames Cook University · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Human childbirth has been described as an "obstetrical dilemma". Evolution favours enlargement of the foetal brain, whilst bipedal locomotion demands a reduction in pelvic breadth for improvements in biomechanical efficiency. The result of this conflict is a human pelvis incongruous with the dynamics of childbirth. Acute genital distortion at delivery can inflict lasting damage to female pelvic function. Pelvic organ prolapse, urinary, faecal incontinence and sexual dysfunction are long-term sequelae rarely discussed at antenatal care, impacting upon the expectant mother's ability to make an informed decision. The alternative option is the elective caesarean section, an abdominal incision bypassing the maladies of a vaginal delivery, although not without complications of its own. Childbirth remains an emotive event where evidence-based medicine can be disempowered, and the rising trend to "normalise" birth can disrupt care of the woman. This needs to be maintained in a healthy balance to best provide competent and safe care for women.

Indexed as

Anal sphincterChildbirthObstetricsPelvic floorTrauma

Identifiers

PMID28546660
PMCPMC5425644
OpenAlexW2597179350

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.